From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/remap_range: avoid spurious writeback on zero length request
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:22:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4TubQFwHExk07w4@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221128160813.3950889-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:08:13AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> generic_remap_checks() can reduce the effective request length (i.e.,
> after the reflink extend to EOF case is handled) down to zero. If this
> occurs, __generic_remap_file_range_prep() proceeds through dio
> serialization, file mapping flush calls, and may invoke file_modified()
> before returning back to the filesystem caller, all of which immediately
> check for len == 0 and return.
>
> While this is mostly harmless, it is spurious and not completely
> without side effect. A filemap write call can submit I/O (but not
> wait on it) when the specified end byte precedes the start but
> happens to land on the same aligned page boundary, which can occur
> from __generic_remap_file_range_prep() when len is 0.
>
> The dedupe path already has a len == 0 check to break out before doing
> range comparisons. Lift this check a bit earlier in the function to
> cover the general case of len == 0 and avoid the unnecessary work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Looks correct,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Should there be an(other) "if (!*len) return 0;" after the
generic_remap_check_len call to skip the mtime update if the remap
request gets shortened to avoid remapping an unaligned eofblock into the
middle of the destination file?
--D
> ---
> fs/remap_range.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/remap_range.c b/fs/remap_range.c
> index 654912d06862..32ea992f9acc 100644
> --- a/fs/remap_range.c
> +++ b/fs/remap_range.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ __generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> remap_flags);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + if (*len == 0)
> + return 0;
>
> /* Wait for the completion of any pending IOs on both files */
> inode_dio_wait(inode_in);
> @@ -328,9 +330,6 @@ __generic_remap_file_range_prep(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> if (remap_flags & REMAP_FILE_DEDUP) {
> bool is_same = false;
>
> - if (*len == 0)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (!IS_DAX(inode_in))
> ret = vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(file_in, pos_in,
> file_out, pos_out, *len, &is_same);
> --
> 2.37.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 16:08 [PATCH] fs/remap_range: avoid spurious writeback on zero length request Brian Foster
2022-11-28 17:22 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-11-29 11:29 ` Brian Foster
2022-11-29 18:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-11-29 18:43 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4TubQFwHExk07w4@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).