linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	hch@infradead.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] fs: remove old MS_* internal flags for the superblock
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:54:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y736p/ChILQE5a9X@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230110022554.1186499-4-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 06:25:54PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> During commit e462ec50cb5 ("VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from
> internal superblock flags") Christoph had suggested we should eventually
> remove these old flags which were exposed to userspace but could not
> be used as they were internal-only.
> 
> Nuke them.

Umm...  They are still exposed to userland after your series, though.
IOW, we can't change the bit assignment of e.g. SB_ACTIVE - the apparmor
part will break, etc.

If anything, it would be more honest to lift the "we ignore those bits"
logics to path_mount()...

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-10  2:25 [RFC 0/3] fs: kill old ms_* flags for internal sb Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-10  2:25 ` [RFC 1/3] apparmor: use SB_* flags for private sb flags Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-10 23:40   ` Al Viro
2023-01-10  2:25 ` [RFC 2/3] fs: use SB_NOUSER on path_mount() instead of deprecated MS_NOUSER Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-10 23:43   ` Al Viro
2023-01-10  2:25 ` [RFC 3/3] fs: remove old MS_* internal flags for the superblock Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-10 23:54   ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y736p/ChILQE5a9X@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).