Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock

[Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:48:44PM +0800, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> Use spinlock in pipe_read/write cost too much time,IMO
> pipe->{head,tail} can be protected by __pipe_{lock,unlock}.
> On the other hand, we can use __pipe_{lock,unlock} to protect
> the pipe->{head,tail} in pipe_resize_ring and
> post_one_notification.
> 
> I tested this patch using UnixBench's pipe test case on a x86_64
> machine,and get the following data:
> 1) before this patch
> System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
> Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     493023.3    396.3
>                                                         ========
> System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              396.3
> 
> 2) after this patch
> System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
> Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     507551.4    408.0
>                                                         ========
> System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              408.0
> 
> so we get ~3% speedup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@loongson.cn>
> ---

After the above "---" line you should have the changlog descrption.
For instance:

v3:
  - fixes bleh blah blah
v2:
  - fixes 0-day report by ... etc..
  - fixes spelling or whatever

I cannot decipher what you did here differently, not do I want to go
looking and diff'ing. So you are making the life of reviewer harder.

  Luis