linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] __unix_find_socket_byname(): don't pass hash and type separately
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 04:23:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YC89U4dM2xX17FwT@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YC86WeSTkYZqRlJY@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>

We only care about exclusive or of those, so pass that directly.
Makes life simpler for callers as well...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index bb4c6200953d..a7e20fcadfcc 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -288,11 +288,11 @@ static inline void unix_insert_socket(struct hlist_head *list, struct sock *sk)
 
 static struct sock *__unix_find_socket_byname(struct net *net,
 					      struct sockaddr_un *sunname,
-					      int len, int type, unsigned int hash)
+					      int len, unsigned int hash)
 {
 	struct sock *s;
 
-	sk_for_each(s, &unix_socket_table[hash ^ type]) {
+	sk_for_each(s, &unix_socket_table[hash]) {
 		struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(s);
 
 		if (!net_eq(sock_net(s), net))
@@ -307,13 +307,12 @@ static struct sock *__unix_find_socket_byname(struct net *net,
 
 static inline struct sock *unix_find_socket_byname(struct net *net,
 						   struct sockaddr_un *sunname,
-						   int len, int type,
-						   unsigned int hash)
+						   int len, unsigned int hash)
 {
 	struct sock *s;
 
 	spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
-	s = __unix_find_socket_byname(net, sunname, len, type, hash);
+	s = __unix_find_socket_byname(net, sunname, len, hash);
 	if (s)
 		sock_hold(s);
 	spin_unlock(&unix_table_lock);
@@ -900,12 +899,12 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct socket *sock)
 retry:
 	addr->len = sprintf(addr->name->sun_path+1, "%05x", ordernum) + 1 + sizeof(short);
 	addr->hash = unix_hash_fold(csum_partial(addr->name, addr->len, 0));
+	addr->hash ^= sk->sk_type;
 
 	spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
 	ordernum = (ordernum+1)&0xFFFFF;
 
-	if (__unix_find_socket_byname(net, addr->name, addr->len, sock->type,
-				      addr->hash)) {
+	if (__unix_find_socket_byname(net, addr->name, addr->len, addr->hash)) {
 		spin_unlock(&unix_table_lock);
 		/*
 		 * __unix_find_socket_byname() may take long time if many names
@@ -920,7 +919,6 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct socket *sock)
 		}
 		goto retry;
 	}
-	addr->hash ^= sk->sk_type;
 
 	__unix_set_addr(sk, addr, addr->hash);
 	err = 0;
@@ -966,7 +964,7 @@ static struct sock *unix_find_other(struct net *net,
 		}
 	} else {
 		err = -ECONNREFUSED;
-		u = unix_find_socket_byname(net, sunname, len, type, hash);
+		u = unix_find_socket_byname(net, sunname, len, type ^ hash);
 		if (u) {
 			struct dentry *dentry;
 			dentry = unix_sk(u)->path.dentry;
@@ -1036,8 +1034,7 @@ static int unix_bind_bsd(struct sock *sk, struct unix_address *addr)
 	return err == -EEXIST ? -EADDRINUSE : err;
 }
 
-static int unix_bind_abstract(struct sock *sk, unsigned hash,
-			      struct unix_address *addr)
+static int unix_bind_abstract(struct sock *sk, struct unix_address *addr)
 {
 	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
 	int err;
@@ -1053,7 +1050,7 @@ static int unix_bind_abstract(struct sock *sk, unsigned hash,
 
 	spin_lock(&unix_table_lock);
 	if (__unix_find_socket_byname(sock_net(sk), addr->name, addr->len,
-				      sk->sk_type, hash)) {
+				      addr->hash)) {
 		spin_unlock(&unix_table_lock);
 		mutex_unlock(&u->bindlock);
 		return -EADDRINUSE;
@@ -1095,7 +1092,7 @@ static int unix_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
 	if (sun_path[0])
 		err = unix_bind_bsd(sk, addr);
 	else
-		err = unix_bind_abstract(sk, hash, addr);
+		err = unix_bind_abstract(sk, addr);
 	if (err)
 		unix_release_addr(addr);
 	return err;
-- 
2.11.0


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-19  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210125154937.26479-1-kda@linux-powerpc.org>
     [not found] ` <20210127175742.GA1744861@infradead.org>
     [not found]   ` <CAOJe8K0MC-TCURE2Gpci1SLnLXCbUkE7q6SS0fznzBA+Pf-B8Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20210129082524.GA2282796@infradead.org>
     [not found]       ` <CAOJe8K0iG91tm8YBRmE_rdMMMbc4iRsMGYNxJk0p9vEedNHEkg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <20210129131855.GA2346744@infradead.org>
2021-02-14 18:17           ` [PATCH] fs: export kern_path_locked Al Viro
2021-02-16 14:31             ` Denis Kirjanov
2021-02-16 18:00               ` Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:11                 ` Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:19                   ` [PATCH 1/8] af_unix: take address assignment/hash insertion into a new helper Al Viro
2021-02-20 19:12                     ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 19:32                       ` Al Viro
2021-02-20 20:31                         ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 21:08                           ` Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:06                             ` [PATCHSET] making unix_bind() undo mknod on failure Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                               ` [PATCH 1/8] af_unix: take address assignment/hash insertion into a new helper Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 2/8] unix_bind(): allocate addr earlier Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 3/8] unix_bind(): separate BSD and abstract cases Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 4/8] unix_bind(): take BSD and abstract address cases into new helpers Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 5/8] fold unix_mknod() into unix_bind_bsd() Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 6/8] unix_bind_bsd(): move done_path_create() call after dealing with ->bindlock Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 7/8] unix_bind_bsd(): unlink if we fail after successful mknod Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                                 ` [PATCH 8/8] __unix_find_socket_byname(): don't pass hash and type separately Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:12                               ` [PATCHSET] making unix_bind() undo mknod on failure Al Viro
2021-02-22 19:24                                 ` Al Viro
2021-02-24  0:40                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-19  4:20                   ` [PATCH 2/8] unix_bind(): allocate addr earlier Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:21                   ` [PATCH 3/8] unix_bind(): separate BSD and abstract cases Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:21                   ` [PATCH 4/8] unix_bind(): take BSD and abstract address cases into new helpers Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:22                   ` [PATCH 5/8] fold unix_mknod() into unix_bind_bsd() Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:22                   ` [PATCH 6/8] unix_bind_bsd(): move done_path_create() call after dealing with ->bindlock Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:23                   ` [PATCH 7/8] unix_bind_bsd(): unlink if we fail after successful mknod Al Viro
2021-02-19  4:23                   ` Al Viro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YC89U4dM2xX17FwT@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).