linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:28:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMomnpDT9EQ/5XB9@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMmfQNjExNs3cuyq@kroah.com>

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:50:40AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:13:16PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:34:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Eventually everything around set_page_dirty should be changed to operate
> > > on folios, and that will be a good time to come up with a sane
> > > naming scheme without introducing extra churn.
> > 
> > The way it currently looks in my tree ...
> > 
> > set_page_dirty(page) is a thin wrapper that calls folio_mark_dirty(folio).
> > folio_mark_dirty() calls a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio) (which
> > 	returns bool).
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() becomes filemap_dirty_folio()
> > __set_page_dirty_buffers() becomes block_dirty_folio()
> > __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() becomes dirty_folio_no_writeback()
> > 
> > Now I look at it, maybe that last should be nowb_dirty_folio().
> 
> Not to be a pain, but you are mixing "folio" at the front and back of
> the api name?  We messed up in the driver core with this for some things
> (get_device() being one), I would recommend just sticking with one
> naming scheme now as you are getting to pick what you want to use.

That is mostly what I'm doing.  eg,

get_page -> folio_get
lock_page -> folio_lock
PageUptodate -> folio_uptodate
set_page_dirty -> folio_mark_dirty

What I haven't dealt with yet is the naming of the
address_space_operations.  My thinking with those is that they should
be verb_folio, since they _aren't_ the functions that get called.
ie it looks like this:

folio_mark_dirty()
  aops->dirty_folio()
    ext4_dirty_folio()
      buffer_dirty_folio()

I actually see the inconsistency here as a good thing -- these are
implementations of the aop, so foo_verb_folio() means you're doing
something weird and internal instead of going through the vfs/mm.

That implies doing things like renaming ->readpage to ->read_folio, but
if we're changing the API from passing a struct page to a struct folio,
that can all be done at the same time with no additional disruption.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 16:23 [PATCH 0/6] Further set_page_dirty cleanups Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/writeback: Move __set_page_dirty() to core mm Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-16 16:14   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/writeback: Use __set_page_dirty in __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:18   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:19   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 17:32     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-15 17:34       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 18:04         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 18:13         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-16  6:50           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-16 16:28             ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-06-16 16:35               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: Remove anon_set_page_dirty() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] fs: Remove noop_set_page_dirty() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-16 18:10   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-16 18:12     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-16 22:33   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: Move page dirtying prototypes from mm.h Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:39   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YMomnpDT9EQ/5XB9@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).