From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A445AC4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED5961B2D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237082AbhG0PRh (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:17:37 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk ([142.44.231.140]:57594 "EHLO zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232633AbhG0PRg (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:17:36 -0400 Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m8OpR-004OC3-9R; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:17:09 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:17:09 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jordy Zomer , Andy Shevchenko , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Peter Zijlstra , Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: make d_path-like functions all have unsigned size Message-ID: References: <20210727103625.74961-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 04:07:47PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > umm ... what if someone passes in -ENOMEM as buflen? Not saying we > have such a path right now, but I could imagine it happening. > > if (unlikely(buflen < 0)) > return ERR_PTR(buflen); > if (unlikely(buflen > 0x8000)) { > buf += buflen - 0x8000; > buflen = 0x8000; > } Not really. You don't want ERR_PTR() of random negative numbers to start flying around...