From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32919C4320E for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F2F60FDA for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243330AbhIBHSR (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 03:18:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33832 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243287AbhIBHSP (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 03:18:15 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95C5BC061575; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 00:17:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ClXCMkYCppEl6bfYfK41euQx4F2YdEHk6mWG/p90Tv0=; b=A9L3b4iimfPMbdilkRg86VELvU tBC23/i8VvVAIHJ6m8OrxxLQipR6r5Tm+fX7RpIeyXCpNb6PjqpDxDd2zFrvZq71feFbE5ueI7qcn 6njt1mLugnZxnqCAQumDTWOB27W8FPzrWhQTkb8ToxCcmMu4e0dcBkrgChfMwpQTbefPWbyumHnGt Qj2MZ63Ag8RUXn+h2tCLbMvHodQumXBVOuPtGH5xPJRVuKHbewCbvEGdhqTaBituMFz//bjX67XaN reo69RJ8b+q1L6F13Ds7LPtC2iKIf9jt9S4h5hIpXapsAbKHpd1liATYpDThX8EGzZyA1c1AqVhT1 eZVWDtsQ==; Received: from hch by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mLgxB-003DAJ-F8; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:16:14 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 08:16:05 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: NeilBrown Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export Message-ID: References: <162995209561.7591.4202079352301963089@noble.neil.brown.name> <162995778427.7591.11743795294299207756@noble.neil.brown.name> <163010550851.7591.9342822614202739406@noble.neil.brown.name> <163038594541.7591.11109978693705593957@noble.neil.brown.name> <163055561473.24419.12486186372497472066@noble.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <163055561473.24419.12486186372497472066@noble.neil.brown.name> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:06:54PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Hi Christoph, > I have to say that I struggle with some of these conversations with > you. > I don't know if it is deliberate on your part, or inadvertent, or > purely in my imagination, but your attitude often seems combative. I > find that to be a disincentive to continuing to engage, which I need to > work hard to overcome. If I'm misunderstanding you, I apologise and > simply ask that you do what you can to compensate for my apparent > sensitivity. I would not call it combative. It is sticking to the points and the red lines. > Your attitude seems to be that this is a btrfs problem and must be > fixed in btrfs. Yes.