From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA981C433F5 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 22:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544061041 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 22:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235189AbhIQWXi (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:23:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232719AbhIQWXg (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:23:36 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08702C061574; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id p4so22133160qki.3; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=/jPNdMJve/KWd/Y4SRkm6hTGIPVm3MyGY8DljibbqNI=; b=QqwLP3Us4ZVFTMjMgU5AFjn7iMsGnla2SZJ+LzOe8OdaUpcAAMFwrGir9T6ArgEGB7 XCo2T64pSyhIwcval7f5pntFIBGxO7rHMYUYdF0clkWtKnQ+qKTKs7RVGxNLz6Jgg2WM wwQjnj+cGuVIUBATRj7IuU/XRYCY/I2YxjMf96jN6IT6I48/MzyJ7pmbw9JA+nRSmTzN M8GGPZceVzyHgJO4yzQPSSa2ewC8d96mTcZcOeeXqhDMDNkwSqE+g6bzT1iAKMSqNAXb tds16cEaXrrcCHZM6D2SqQ8uwqLWDZ934hEcpU2MmdlTWcR1naWFA5WhyzV2TRQKMsmy eWjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=/jPNdMJve/KWd/Y4SRkm6hTGIPVm3MyGY8DljibbqNI=; b=UMzFw2/9Y5IFo+LZBYGEX19MTyEz+yy7j7RLuswp+wZp1RsI1aQmfZxM8dVWO4MJK+ BM1cd2kZ/xEfu9VqCiER5vN65YfNsCRhcCfkK3FW8kSzs7nMEgG5vvJbyjK1E2WB29lv 0t0AwZCQZTdL44FlwoGqJAV2N9/60uwGg9uWMpCNMtTwadw85cOkl2xBEKlBnu+7Sh8z fAtALS2VYAGyjFfku1/GjgT4+8rNIkj/OFKrPi7t9e31gB2jZr5N102GKdgA9ksaezqm K1E484qqitgCCb3CKLjV/36LiHT9BB0ggG9L0yRO5WKK2Pav/e998r95hZHErgpKqJox i3Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WVBgXAinAbv8zbmXm0470Bzp+nVRgv2UQ/EfYyQ/JmztLgl6t b8wXNz7IxD0UOJfJP2p9gsCkjy80r247 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhxqWgAMwUMkp3GuqQcsFSxs2VvVCVehg+0V9IrYi7ta6rckoWQWSUGG2MuudeEO2p0knrHw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa8f:: with SMTP id t137mr12790727qke.30.1631917322001; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moria.home.lan (c-73-219-103-14.hsd1.vt.comcast.net. [73.219.103.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a24sm3520757qtp.90.2021.09.17.15.22.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:21:59 -0400 From: Kent Overstreet To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Johannes Weiner , Dave Chinner , "Darrick J. Wong" , Matthew Wilcox , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , David Howells Subject: Re: Folio discussion recap Message-ID: References: <20210916025854.GE34899@magnolia> <20210917052440.GJ1756565@dread.disaster.area> <20210917205735.tistsacwwzkcdklx@box.shutemov.name> <20210917220209.zhac33jiqtxvdttk@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210917220209.zhac33jiqtxvdttk@box> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 01:02:09AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > I can't answer for Matthew. > > Anon conversion patchset doesn't exists yet (but it is in plans) so > there's nothing to split out. Once someone will come up with such patchset > he has to sell it upstream on its own merit. Perhaps we've been operating under some incorrect assumptions then. If the current patch series doesn't actually touch anonymous pages - the patch series does touch code in e.g. mm/swap.c, but looking closer it might just be due to the (mis)organization of the current code - maybe there aren't any real objections left?