From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Linux FS-devel Mailing List" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 2/5] mm: filemap: check if THP has hwpoisoned subpage for PMD page fault
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 07:13:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWdoDn4uEYG8jpXH@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbLzkrcOpG5AHk934hDJb2d+FocYjUc6nhBRofhTbTxLVWtYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:42:42PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:41 PM Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 08:27:06PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > > But this also reminded me that shouldn't we be with the page lock already
> > > > during the process of "setting hwpoison-subpage bit, split thp, clear
> > > > hwpoison-subpage bit"? If it's only the small window that needs protection,
> > > > while when looking up the shmem pagecache we always need to take the page lock
> > > > too, then it seems already safe even without the extra bit? Hmm?
> > >
> > > I don't quite get your point. Do you mean memory_failure()? If so the
> > > answer is no, outside the page lock. And the window may be indefinite
> > > since file THP doesn't get split before this series and the split may
> > > fail even after this series.
> >
> > What I meant is that we could extend the page_lock in try_to_split_thp_page()
> > to cover setting hwpoison-subpage too (and it of course covers the clearing if
> > thp split succeeded, as that's part of the split process). But yeah it's a
> > good point that the split may fail, so the extra bit seems still necessary.
> >
> > Maybe that'll be something worth mentioning in the commit message too? The
> > commit message described very well on the overhead of looping over 512 pages,
> > however the reader can easily overlook the real reason for needing this bit -
> > IMHO it's really for the thp split failure case, as we could also mention that
> > if thp split won't fail, page lock should be suffice (imho). We could also
>
> Not only for THP split failure case. Before this series, shmem THP
> does't get split at all. And this commit is supposed to be backported
> to the older versions, so saying "page lock is sufficient" is not
> precise and confusing.
Sure, please feel free to use any wording you prefer as long as the other side
of the lock besides the performance impact could be mentioned. Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 21:53 [RFC v3 PATCH 0/5] Solve silent data loss caused by poisoned page cache (shmem/tmpfs) Yang Shi
2021-09-30 21:53 ` [v3 PATCH 1/5] mm: hwpoison: remove the unnecessary THP check Yang Shi
2021-10-06 2:35 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-06 4:00 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2021-10-06 17:56 ` Yang Shi
2021-09-30 21:53 ` [v3 PATCH 2/5] mm: filemap: check if THP has hwpoisoned subpage for PMD page fault Yang Shi
2021-10-01 7:23 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2021-10-01 21:07 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-04 14:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-10-04 18:17 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-04 19:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-10-04 20:13 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-06 19:54 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-06 23:41 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-07 16:14 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-07 18:28 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-08 9:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-10-11 22:57 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-06 20:15 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-06 23:57 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-07 16:06 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-07 18:19 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-07 20:27 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-07 21:28 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-12 0:55 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-12 1:44 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-12 18:02 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-12 22:10 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 2:48 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 3:01 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 3:27 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 3:41 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 21:42 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 23:13 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-10-14 6:54 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2021-10-06 20:18 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-07 2:49 ` Yang Shi
2021-11-01 19:05 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-11-01 19:26 ` Yang Shi
2021-09-30 21:53 ` [v3 PATCH 3/5] mm: hwpoison: refactor refcount check handling Yang Shi
2021-10-06 22:01 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-07 2:47 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-07 16:18 ` Peter Xu
2021-09-30 21:53 ` [v3 PATCH 4/5] mm: shmem: don't truncate page if memory failure happens Yang Shi
2021-10-01 7:05 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2021-10-01 21:08 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-12 1:57 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-12 19:17 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-12 22:26 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 3:00 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 3:06 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-13 3:29 ` Yang Shi
2021-09-30 21:53 ` [v3 PATCH 5/5] mm: hwpoison: handle non-anonymous THP correctly Yang Shi
2021-10-01 7:06 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2021-10-01 21:09 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 2:40 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 0/5] Solve silent data loss caused by poisoned page cache (shmem/tmpfs) Peter Xu
2021-10-13 3:09 ` Yang Shi
2021-10-13 3:24 ` Peter Xu
2021-10-14 6:54 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWdoDn4uEYG8jpXH@t490s \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).