From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: do not try to evict inode when super is frozen
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:04:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiJUsxjoHNiqEaFG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YiGgSmEOZUvgmSto@google.com>
On 03/03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 03/04, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 06:21:04PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > Otherwise, we will get a deadlock.
> >
> > NACK.
> >
> > We have to be able to evict clean inodes from memory on frozen
> > inodes because we can still instantiate inodes while the filesytem
> > is frozen. e.g. there's a find running when the filesystem is
> > frozen. What happens if we can't evict clean cached inodes from
> > memory when we run out of memory trying to instantiate new inodes?
>
> Ok, that makes sense.
>
> >
> > >
> > > [freeze test] shrinkder
> > > freeze_super
> > > - pwercpu_down_write(SB_FREEZE_FS)
> > > - super_cache_scan
> > > - down_read(&sb->s_umount)
> > > - prune_icache_sb
> > > - dispose_list
> > > - evict
> > > - f2fs_evict_inode
> > > thaw_super
> > > - down_write(&sb->s_umount);
> > > - __percpu_down_read(SB_FREEZE_FS)
> >
> > That seems like a f2fs bug, not a generic problem.
> >
> > Filesystems already have to handle stuff like this if an unlinked
> > file is closed while the fs is frozen - we have to handle inode
> > eviction needing to modify the file, and different filesystems
> > handle this differently. Most filesystems simply block in
> > ->evict_inode in this case, but this never occurs from the shrinker
> > context.
> >
> > IOWs, the shrinker should never be evicting inodes that require the
> > filesystem to immediately block on frozen filesystems. If you have
> > such inodes in cache at the time the filesystem is frozen, then they
> > should be purged from the cache as part of the freeze process so the
> > shrinker won't ever find inodes that it could deadlock on.
>
> If so, is this a bug in drop_caches_sysctl_handler? Or, I shouldn't have
> used "echo 3 > sysfs/drop_caches" with freezefs in xfstests?
My bad. I totally misunderstood. I'm testing a patch to call evict_inodes()
in f2fs_freeze(). Thank you for the comment. :)
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave.
> > --
> > Dave Chinner
> > david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-04 2:21 [PATCH] vfs: do not try to evict inode when super is frozen Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-04 2:48 ` Dave Chinner
2022-03-04 5:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-04 18:04 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2022-03-04 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiJUsxjoHNiqEaFG@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).