From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Significant brokenness in DIO loopback path
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 20:44:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YilX4PHgulMi3vhb@moria.home.lan> (raw)
So I'm testing bcachefs with the loopback driver in dio mode, and noticing
_significant_ brokenness in the bio_iov_iter_get_pages() path and elsewhere.
1) We don't check that we're not asking for more pages than we're in the
original bio
Noticed this because of another bug:
2) the loopback driver appears to never look at the underlying filesystem's
block size, meaning if the filesystem advertises a block size of 4k the loopback
device's blocksize will still be 512, and we'll end up issuing IOs the DIO path
shouldn't allow due to alignment.
3) iov_iter_bvec_advance() looks like utter nonsense. We're synthesizing a fake
bvec_iter and never using or even looking at one from the original bio, looking
at the construction in iov_iter_bvec().
This is broken; you're assuming you're never going to see bios with partially
completed bvec_iters, or things are going to explode.
Try putting a md raid0 on top of two loopback devices with a sub page block
size, things are just going to explode.
iov_iter_bvec() needs to be changed to take a bio, not a bvec array, and
iov_iter_bvec_advance() should probably just call bio_advance() - and
bio_iov_bvec_set() needs to be changed to just copy bi_iter from the original
bio into the dest bio. You guys made this way more complicated than it needed to
be.
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 1:44 Kent Overstreet [this message]
2022-03-10 3:16 ` Significant brokenness in DIO loopback path Ming Lei
2022-03-10 5:17 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YilX4PHgulMi3vhb@moria.home.lan \
--to=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).