Re: btrfs profiles to test was: (Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees)

[Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 06:07:21PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:51:22PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > [root@fedora-rawhide ~]# cat /xfstests-dev/local.config
> > > [btrfs_normal_freespacetree]
> > > [btrfs_compress_freespacetree]
> > > [btrfs_normal]
> > > [btrfs_compression]
> > > [kdave]
> > > [btrfs_normal_noholes]
> > > [btrfs_compress_noholes]
> > > [btrfs_noholes_freespacetree]
> > 
> > + linux-btrfs and zone folks.
> > 
> > The name needs to be: $FS_$FANCY_SINGLE_SPACED_NAME
> 
> Actually using_underscores_is_fine for the hostnames so we can keep
> your original except kdave :) and that just gets mapped to btrfs_kdave
> for now until you guys figure out what to call it.
> 

Lol you didn't need to save the name, I just threw that in there because Sterba
wanted me to test something specific for some patch and I just never deleted it.

> Likewise it would be useful if someone goees through these and gives me
> hints as to the kernel revision that supports such config, so that if
> testing on stable for instance or an older kernel, then the kconfig
> option for them does not appear.
> 

I'm cloning this stuff and doing it now, I got fed up trying to find the
performance difference between virtme and libvirt.  If your shit gives me the
right performance and makes it so I don't have to think then I'll be happy
enough to use it.  Thanks,

Josef