From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"vgoyal@redhat.com" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] dax: add DAX_RECOVERY flag and .recovery_write dev_pgmap_ops
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 22:45:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjq0FspfsLrN/mrx@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3dabd58b-70f2-12af-419f-a7dfc07fbb1c@oracle.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:05:09PM +0000, Jane Chu wrote:
> > This DAX_RECOVERY doesn't actually seem to be used anywhere here or
> > in the subsequent patches. Did I miss something?
>
> dax_iomap_iter() uses the flag in the same patch,
> + if ((map_len == -EIO) && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)) {
> + flags |= DAX_RECOVERY;
> + map_len = dax_direct_access(dax_dev, pgoff, nrpg,
> + flags, &kaddr, NULL);
Yes, it passes it on to dax_direct_access, and dax_direct_access passes
it onto ->direct_access. But nothing in this series actually checks
for it as far as I can tell.
> >> Also introduce a new dev_pagemap_ops .recovery_write function.
> >> The function is applicable to FSDAX device only. The device
> >> page backend driver provides .recovery_write function if the
> >> device has underlying mechanism to clear the uncorrectable
> >> errors on the fly.
> >
> > Why is this not in struct dax_operations?
>
> Per Dan's comments to the v5 series, adding .recovery_write to
> dax_operations causes a number of trivial dm targets changes.
> Dan suggested that adding .recovery_write to pagemap_ops could
> cut short the logistics of figuring out whether the driver backing
> up a page is indeed capable of clearing poison. Please see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/4/31
But at least in this series there is 1:1 association between the
pgmap and the dax_device so that scheme won't work. It would
have to lookup the pgmap based on the return physical address from
dax_direct_access. Which sounds more complicated than just adding
the (annoying) boilerplate code to DM.
> include/linux/memremap.h doesn't know struct iov_iter which is defined
> in include/linux/uio.h, would you prefer to adding include/linux/uio.h
> to include/linux/memremap.h ?
As it is not derefences just adding a
struct iov_iter;
line to memremap.h below the includes should be all that is needed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-19 6:28 [PATCH v6 0/6] DAX poison recovery Jane Chu
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] x86/mm: fix comment Jane Chu
2022-03-22 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] x86/mce: relocate set{clear}_mce_nospec() functions Jane Chu
2022-03-19 8:13 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-19 8:24 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-22 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 22:19 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-22 22:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-22 23:48 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] mce: fix set_mce_nospec to always unmap the whole page Jane Chu
2022-03-22 8:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 22:45 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] dax: add DAX_RECOVERY flag and .recovery_write dev_pgmap_ops Jane Chu
2022-03-19 8:24 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-19 8:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-22 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 23:05 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-23 5:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-03-23 18:43 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-24 6:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-26 6:31 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] pmem: refactor pmem_clear_poison() Jane Chu
2022-03-22 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 23:45 ` Jane Chu
2022-03-19 6:28 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] pmem: implement pmem_recovery_write() Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yjq0FspfsLrN/mrx@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).