From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99C6C433FE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239333AbiDEJxZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 05:53:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44180 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344183AbiDEJSg (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 05:18:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD2063BE8 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 02:04:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1649149498; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rIfAwkshslHsyBEcRq37RepeRC/o2pa9Iv1u9kDoOp8=; b=InCT8tvz50DU2ldCz1X+HCiiOLmLurNwStv0maIY+Ojmt7HUvkawvEauKaXG09ObjgX6Ye Q9O+D0YT9BcPp5uwXR1LS0UZkE5GG2V9O+bmr9FpQUh6gVTPQkHCAvzKRnBM3W0rKdGoI5 NgrWUlk1m1+a+rdWhAmL3vMnk7jJBgE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-317-TgqGk4AON6G7A7V85iHh5w-1; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 05:04:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TgqGk4AON6G7A7V85iHh5w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D79B3801ECB; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-104.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.104]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE8041617C; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:04:51 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Andrew Morton Cc: willy@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, yangtiezhu@loongson.cn, amit.kachhap@arm.com, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Convert vmcore to use an iov_iter Message-ID: References: <20220402043008.458679-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20220404143443.2258fc7e97b45172f7608a77@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220404143443.2258fc7e97b45172f7608a77@linux-foundation.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 04/04/22 at 02:34pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 12:30:05 +0800 Baoquan He wrote: > > You were on the patch delivery path, so these patches should have had > your signoff. Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst explains. OK, will update and repost after our IT replying and fixing the mail issue. > > > Copy the description of v3 cover letter from Willy: > > === > > For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix > > compiler warnings in vmcore recently. Here's how it should be done. > > Compile-tested only on x86. As noted in the first patch, s390 should > > take this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined to do that > > work myself. > > We should tell the S390 maintainers this! > > Can you please fix the signoff issue, add the S390 team to Cc and resend? S390 maintainer has already known this. Heiko replied to v1 saying he will take care of the s390 part, please see his comment from below link. I will add Heiko in CC when resend. https://lore.kernel.org/all/YbsGxJRo1153aykr@osiris/T/#u