From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Freeing page flags
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 22:41:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn3FZSZbEDssbRnk@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yn10Iz1mJX1Mu1rv@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 09:54:59PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> The LWN writeup [1] on merging the MGLRU reminded me that I need to send
> out a plan for removing page flags that we can do without.
>
> 1. PG_error. It's basically useless. If the page was read successfully,
> PG_uptodate is set. If not, PG_uptodate is clear. The page cache
> doesn't use PG_error. Some filesystems do, and we need to transition
> them away from using it.
>
What about writes? A cursory look shows we don't clear Uptodate if we fail to
write, which is correct I think. The only way to indicate we had a write error
to check later is the page error.
> 2. PG_private. This tells us whether we have anything stored at
> page->private. We can just check if page->private is NULL or not.
> No need to have this extra bit. Again, there may be some filesystems
> that are a bit wonky here, but I'm sure they're fixable.
>
At least for Btrfs we serialize the page->private with the private_lock, so we
could probably just drop PG_private, but it's kind of nice to check first before
we have to take the spin lock. I suppose we can just do
if (page->private)
// do lock and check thingy
Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 20:54 Freeing page flags Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 2:41 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2022-05-13 3:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 9:40 ` Luís Henriques
2022-05-13 12:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 13:18 ` Luís Henriques
2022-05-13 13:21 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-13 13:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 13:57 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-17 0:34 ` Xiubo Li
2022-05-13 13:17 ` Josef Bacik
2022-05-13 3:46 ` Yu Zhao
2022-05-14 6:10 ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-23 6:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-06-10 17:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-30 16:54 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn3FZSZbEDssbRnk@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).