linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dharmendra Singh <dharamhans87@gmail.com>,
	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: allow ->atomic_open() on positive
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:09:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yoaj7jhLpp34K9+v@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YoZXro9PoYAPUeh5@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com>

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:43:58PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> Do you see anything bad with allowing ->atomic_open() to take a positive dentry
> and possibly invalidate it after it does the atomic LOOKUP/CREATE+OPEN?
> 
> It looks wrong not to allow optimizing away the roundtrip associated with
> revalidation when we do allow optimizing away the roundtrip for the initial
> lookup in the same situation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Miklos
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 509657fdf4f5..d35b5cbf7f64 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3267,7 +3267,7 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_open(struct nameidata *nd, struct file *file,
>  		dput(dentry);
>  		dentry = NULL;
>  	}
> -	if (dentry->d_inode) {
> +	if (dentry->d_inode && !d_atomic_open(dentry)) {
>  		/* Cached positive dentry: will open in f_op->open */
>  		return dentry;

Hi Miklos,

I see that lookup_open() calls d_revalidate() first. So basically
idea is that fuse ->.d_revalidate will skip LOOKUP needed to make sure
dentry is still valid (Only if atomic lookup+open is implemented) and
return 1 claiming dentry is valid.

And later in ->atomic_open(), it will either open the file or 
get an error and invalidate dentry. Hence will save one LOOKUP in
success case. Do I understand the intent right?

Thanks
Vivek

>  	}
> diff --git a/include/linux/dcache.h b/include/linux/dcache.h
> index f5bba51480b2..da681bdbc34e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dcache.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dcache.h
> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct dentry_operations {
>  #define DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME		0x02000000 /* Encrypted name encoded without key */
>  #define DCACHE_OP_REAL			0x04000000
>  
> +#define DCACHE_ATOMIC_OPEN		0x08000000 /* Always use ->atomic_open() to open this file */
>  #define DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP		0x10000000 /* being looked up (with parent locked shared) */
>  #define DCACHE_DENTRY_CURSOR		0x20000000
>  #define DCACHE_NORCU			0x40000000 /* No RCU delay for freeing */
> @@ -446,6 +447,11 @@ static inline bool d_is_positive(const struct dentry *dentry)
>  	return !d_is_negative(dentry);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool d_atomic_open(const struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +	return dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_ATOMIC_OPEN;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * d_really_is_negative - Determine if a dentry is really negative (ignoring fallthroughs)
>   * @dentry: The dentry in question
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 14:43 [RFC PATCH] vfs: allow ->atomic_open() on positive Miklos Szeredi
2022-05-19 20:09 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2022-05-19 20:43   ` Bernd Schubert
2022-05-19 20:50     ` Vivek Goyal
2022-05-20  6:48   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-05-20  4:07 ` Al Viro
2022-05-20  6:44   ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yoaj7jhLpp34K9+v@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
    --cc=dharamhans87@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).