From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jeremy Bongio <bongiojp@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add ioctls to get/set the ext4 superblock uuid.
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 20:08:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YthSysIGldWhK6f+@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YthNrO4PMR+5ao+6@magnolia>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:47:08AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 07:27:02PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:00:25PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 03:11:21PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > Uhhh. So what are the semantics of len? That is, on SET, what does
> > > > a filesystem do if userspace says "Here's 8 bytes" but the filesystem
> > > > usually uses 16 bytes? What does the same filesystem do if userspace
> > > > offers it 32 bytes? If the answer is "returns -EINVAL", how does
> > > > userspace discover what size of volume ID is acceptable to a particular
> > > > filesystem?
> > > >
> > > > And then, on GET, does 'len' just mean "here's the length of the buffer,
> > > > put however much will fit into it"? Should filesystems update it to
> > > > inform userspace how much was transferred?
> > >
> > > What I'd suggest is that for GET, the length field when called should
> > > be the length of the buffer, and if the length is too small, we should
> > > return some error --- probably EINVAL or ENOSPC. If the buffer size
> > > length is larger than what is needed, having the file system update it
> > > with the size of the UUID that was returned.
>
> I'd suggest something different -- calling the getfsuuid ioctl with a
> null argument should return the filesystem's volid/uuid size as the
> return value. If userspace supplies a non-null argument, then fsu_len
> has to match the filesystem's volid/uuid size or else you get EINVAL.
Or userspace passes in 0 for the len and the filesystem returns -EINVAL
and sets ->len to what the valid size would be? There's a few ways of
solving this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-19 23:41 [PATCH v4] Add ioctls to get/set the ext4 superblock uuid Jeremy Bongio
2022-07-20 3:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-20 3:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-20 14:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-20 18:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-20 18:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-20 18:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-20 19:08 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-07-20 20:11 ` Jeremy Bongio
2022-07-20 20:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-07-20 14:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YthSysIGldWhK6f+@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=bongiojp@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).