From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:05:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuNcd7q6a33tqkAf@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220728133914.49890-2-lczerner@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 03:39:14PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Currently the I_DIRTY_TIME will never get set if the inode already has
> I_DIRTY_INODE with assumption that it supersedes I_DIRTY_TIME. That's
> true, however ext4 will only update the on-disk inode in
> ->dirty_inode(), not on actual writeback. As a result if the inode
> already has I_DIRTY_INODE state by the time we get to
> __mark_inode_dirty() only with I_DIRTY_TIME, the time was already filled
> into on-disk inode and will not get updated until the next I_DIRTY_INODE
> update, which might never come if we crash or get a power failure.
>
> The problem can be reproduced on ext4 by running xfstest generic/622
> with -o iversion mount option. Fix it by setting I_DIRTY_TIME even if
> the inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE.
>
> Also clear the I_DIRTY_TIME after ->dirty_inode() otherwise it may never
> get cleared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
If you're going to change the meaning of I_* flags, please update the comment in
include/linux/fs.h that describes what they mean.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-29 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 13:39 [PATCH 1/2] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Lukas Czerner
2022-07-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE Lukas Czerner
2022-07-28 16:53 ` Jan Kara
2022-07-29 8:52 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-07-29 11:18 ` Jan Kara
2022-07-29 4:05 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-07-29 8:54 ` Lukas Czerner
2022-07-28 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes Jan Kara
2022-08-02 11:58 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuNcd7q6a33tqkAf@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).