From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"jane.chu@oracle.com" <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:49:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YwzSE2U8iYLRfyxf@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72fa9657-741a-e099-baf8-4615145d7bd1@fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 06:02:11PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>
>
> 在 2022/8/27 5:35, Dan Williams 写道:
> > Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > This patch is inspired by Dan's "mm, dax, pmem: Introduce
> > > dev_pagemap_failure()"[1]. With the help of dax_holder and
> > > ->notify_failure() mechanism, the pmem driver is able to ask filesystem
> > > (or mapped device) on it to unmap all files in use and notify processes
> > > who are using those files.
> > >
> > > Call trace:
> > > trigger unbind
> > > -> unbind_store()
> > > -> ... (skip)
> > > -> devres_release_all()
> > > -> kill_dax()
> > > -> dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
> > > -> xfs_dax_notify_failure()
> > >
> > > Introduce MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE to let filesystem know this is a remove
> > > event. So do not shutdown filesystem directly if something not
> > > supported, or if failure range includes metadata area. Make sure all
> > > files and processes are handled correctly.
> > >
> > > ==
> > > Changes since v6:
> > > 1. Rebase on 6.0-rc2 and Darrick's patch[2].
> > >
> > > Changes since v5:
> > > 1. Renamed MF_MEM_REMOVE to MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE
> > > 2. hold s_umount before sync_filesystem()
> > > 3. do sync_filesystem() after SB_BORN check
> > > 4. Rebased on next-20220714
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/161604050314.1463742.14151665140035795571.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
> > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Yv5wIa2crHioYeRr@magnolia/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/dax/super.c | 3 ++-
> > > fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
> > > index 9b5e2a5eb0ae..cf9a64563fbe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dax/super.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
> > > @@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ void kill_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> > > return;
> > > if (dax_dev->holder_data != NULL)
> > > - dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, 0);
> > > + dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX,
> > > + MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE);
> > > clear_bit(DAXDEV_ALIVE, &dax_dev->flags);
> > > synchronize_srcu(&dax_srcu);
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> > > index 65d5eb20878e..a9769f17e998 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> > > @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ xfs_dax_failure_fn(
> > > if (XFS_RMAP_NON_INODE_OWNER(rec->rm_owner) ||
> > > (rec->rm_flags & (XFS_RMAP_ATTR_FORK | XFS_RMAP_BMBT_BLOCK))) {
> > > + /* Do not shutdown so early when device is to be removed */
> > > + if (notify->mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
> > > + return 0;
> > > notify->want_shutdown = true;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -182,12 +185,22 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
> > > struct xfs_mount *mp = dax_holder(dax_dev);
> > > u64 ddev_start;
> > > u64 ddev_end;
> > > + int error;
> > > if (!(mp->m_sb.sb_flags & SB_BORN)) {
> >
> > How are you testing the SB_BORN interactions? I have a fix for this
> > pending here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/nvdimm/166153428094.2758201.7936572520826540019.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com/
>
> That was my mistake. Yes, it should be mp->m_super->s_flags.
>
> (I remember my testcase did pass in my dev version, but now that seems
> impossible. I think something was wrong when I did the test.)
>
> >
> > > xfs_warn(mp, "filesystem is not ready for notify_failure()!");
> > > return -EIO;
> > > }
> > > + if (mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE) {
> >
> > It appears this patch is corrupted here. I confirmed that b4 sees the
> > same when trying to apply it.
>
> Can't this patch be applied? It is based on 6.0-rc2 + Darrick's patch. It's
> also ok to rebase on 6.0-rc3 + Darrick's patch.
>
> >
> > > + xfs_info(mp, "device is about to be removed!");
> > > + down_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
> > > + error = sync_filesystem(mp->m_super);
> >
> > This syncs to make data persistent, but for DAX this also needs to get
> > invalidate all current DAX mappings. I do not see that in these changes.
>
> I'll add it.
Are you guys going to pick up [1]?
--D
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Yv5wIa2crHioYeRr@magnolia/
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ruan.
>
> >
> > > + up_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
> > > + if (error)
> > > + return error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (mp->m_rtdev_targp && mp->m_rtdev_targp->bt_daxdev == dax_dev) {
> > > xfs_warn(mp,
> > > "notify_failure() not supported on realtime device!");
> > > @@ -196,6 +209,8 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
> > > if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp->bt_daxdev == dax_dev &&
> > > mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp) {
> > > + if (mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
> > > + return 0;
> > > xfs_err(mp, "ondisk log corrupt, shutting down fs!");
> > > xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_ONDISK);
> > > return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > index 982f2607180b..2c7c132e6512 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > @@ -3176,6 +3176,7 @@ enum mf_flags {
> > > MF_UNPOISON = 1 << 4,
> > > MF_SW_SIMULATED = 1 << 5,
> > > MF_NO_RETRY = 1 << 6,
> > > + MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE = 1 << 7,
> > > };
> > > int mf_dax_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
> > > unsigned long count, int mf_flags);
> > > --
> > > 2.37.2
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-26 13:03 [PATCH v7] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind Shiyang Ruan
2022-08-26 21:35 ` Dan Williams
2022-08-29 10:02 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-08-29 14:49 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-09-02 10:35 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix the calculation of length and end Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: move drop_pagecache_sb() for others to use Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-02 10:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce MF_MEM_REMOVE for unbind Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-15 1:49 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-20 2:45 ` Dave Chinner
2022-09-21 0:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-07 9:46 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-14 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-14 18:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-09-15 2:56 ` Shiyang Ruan
2022-09-16 15:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YwzSE2U8iYLRfyxf@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).