From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/exec.c: Add fast path for ENOENT on PATH search before allocating mm
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:13:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyTY+OaClK+JHCOw@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202209160727.5FC78B735@keescook>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:38:37AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 02:41:30PM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Currently, execve allocates an mm and parses argv and envp before
> > checking if the path exists. However, the common case of a $PATH search
> > may have several failed calls to exec before a single success. Do a
> > filename lookup for the purposes of returning ENOENT before doing more
> > expensive operations.
>
> At first I didn't understand how you were seeing this, since I'm so used
> to watching shell scripts under tracing, which correctly use stat():
>
> $ strace bash -c foo
> stat("/home/keescook/bin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/usr/local/sbin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/usr/local/bin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/usr/sbin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/usr/bin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/sbin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> stat("/bin/foo", 0x7ffe1f9ddea0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
> But I see, yes, glibc tries to actually call execve(), which, as you
> say, is extremely heavy:
>
> $ strace ./execvpe
> ...
> execve("/home/kees/bin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/usr/local/sbin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/usr/local/bin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/usr/sbin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/usr/bin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/sbin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> execve("/bin/foo", ["./execvpe"], 0x7ffc542bff38 /* 33 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
> This really seems much more like a glibc bug. The shell does it correctly...
musl does the same thing, as do python and perl (likely via execvp or
posix_spawnp). As does gcc when it executes `as`. And I've seen more
than a few programs hand-implement a PATH search the same way. Seems
worth optimizing for.
And with io_uring_spawn, it'll be the substantially easier approach,
since it'll just require one pass (series of execs) rather than two
(stats then exec).
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-16 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-16 13:41 [PATCH] fs/exec.c: Add fast path for ENOENT on PATH search before allocating mm Josh Triplett
2022-09-16 14:38 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-16 20:13 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2022-09-17 0:11 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-17 0:50 ` Josh Triplett
2022-09-19 20:02 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-01 16:01 ` Josh Triplett
2022-09-19 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-22 7:27 ` [fs/exec.c] 0a276ae2d2: BUG:workqueue_lockup-pool kernel test robot
2023-11-07 20:30 ` [PATCH] fs/exec.c: Add fast path for ENOENT on PATH search before allocating mm Kees Cook
2023-11-07 20:51 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-07 21:23 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-07 22:50 ` Kees Cook
2023-11-07 23:08 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-07 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2023-11-08 0:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-08 19:25 ` Kees Cook
2023-11-08 19:31 ` Kees Cook
2023-11-08 19:35 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-09 0:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-11-09 12:21 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-11-10 5:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-11-07 20:37 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyTY+OaClK+JHCOw@localhost \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).