From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57C324EF65 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743690833; cv=none; b=VQVX82n+ehckD/rssfKPpg5akox0BuIeD8ruUa3vKTR0rvcH+d+LtTAh4fvO+zofMdjJLg/BPVjQEV8Qo1Gfu94ks2QcO6iHsyFT/vKDWR+GvOUJvPyfLHC8DTNwYXWt432p6/0QU85GAV2+5i1YDCIoBdQNyGAFUqLYIaQIOd8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743690833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2TDuYkbffUtZNscUeDutELeW6f7LQjrZgxY+nNhgpLE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CBRmdOOwr9ruFtsxUTfmnDc8I/P5p8KerbUpngQQvVKVmH+nVmlIh9RSL128H9DdstCyqCo0uKWcDmWvkZ7SDpJrTSkfDfaPpP1UJG/23HKuxgXQ7+57KQgN0E5nPr1u/gXp7/OJZewNwyqCJIzna04M4RrfVOrGApNd907EzPE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=EdhPOjru; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="EdhPOjru" Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39c266c1389so689893f8f.1 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:33:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1743690830; x=1744295630; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aVBsZKIQ13uHowU1y9quubDy59z6xGT4gKGYHYzC0SY=; b=EdhPOjruny9SF+Om2FL286F5rm+MuPsGFewvXHKsr+8Q/rSyyyvMMTuT8Sc1kmfwNA k5toU9M/MSyC2+aQrRAXqjOMwyg+iE4H/ulY6fuYFgYBOzkZclvolGeFzXKjJcYkOZHO ypdUolKtJHegE8S4JsZ6AvgAWRDQhDniX958Kb+ZkSQCyMI+o5oZ3PzVkv5bmEPvfDzS sGCzW+WRF1xSbUr+u2S9IAWLw5+XHltx1nzdPx6J+bV1Jsykv77CXnWOsKt33wYji45s t2Br/yaBTHrybbBkpCGlsFka3kQrFj3nIASIorLUas6Ez0Yw2vebtf411e6Pdk+bKGFn ecUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743690830; x=1744295630; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aVBsZKIQ13uHowU1y9quubDy59z6xGT4gKGYHYzC0SY=; b=QTZAuAGgGHwENtgzShzZbzWGexTVH8yw106+T49AO+RLGopW7svH5WoEb5ZJnaMimo 7+CACFcei1fq4gJM1Z38d9Kj47S2rZZcEMlkFxK9/Y5Xaof4ujDzBdZcDvgnemLlHGJd r1nyWawXrCnqoSgmh1Wx2BGpk1ie+65+RLrRgmeOVxw58JrwUtYdc7P8iyazgmyaW1qD 3EYSDYzYde8gvc2vKGmy/2GDZU8Tfh+Hd3cmohJNexJCfM4deOCWf69DO1GKDmq0hqjW m7gO0EOgivdoV3e6u/YMLpw97Z99Qy00OkUybXLdOBx+ZCPu0Z9sA19+UFrhlK/f/4vU 4BHw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVvvK3NrNiymKQdQLC/Dsy3ZR6Fk2atbO0np7zYVLkpBC1FyCPUAKS+9nuJ4vKrmyZTrFgkcxEmiUw35+gQ@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzjqAukopfxHswdcx/+hj8WKOfhE3DwOWUqEMxehBMKmrhZ0Qu0 /yx4Dh6QPO2imYauYWbJve17732CV3IbDXoQoTfuG4N/4jUd+uO70/asZInElgA= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctSdiEr6KcWt0JIDDI8AFnxqQNlUcNwxge9Wazgh6QkP/bJoriLzgSnglKyVmm fuCefQvtqUUWCgidTixea+pNYNWI1y1kXupwJkzAe4LifTeHfvslFf1Y7j4FuH07F9GGKJ6h3HK 1Wp50Dz4A6P7xCO+0TKk5oD2IlHGHrwbNUWq8EFhGlgPMyZqdIDHy/h7c/tAmeEJt0l2n6pqQv/ 2APdolM9g9Ry6OhZ7FMVVNNRc9BDfgC26PTZcHtvFLhajIDGH/tqnOXzEktNRnbiyZI3Mn8zg98 dPAFnIBzh7BKR2tWnpGdqjAqORuQ/fiG8ACxWtsYaJcRkCOkQwCHmPc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGiE0x1PAaWMGoC9ZFiaYEPiaIq/uegZ4wpDRjLqos6a0KnKZou0W0iioyFZ8bH2QBAeGB+w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2407:b0:39c:1424:3246 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39c142432d7mr17623759f8f.2.1743690829940; Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (109-81-82-69.rct.o2.cz. [109.81.82.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-39c30096b9csm1987759f8f.13.2025.04.03.07.33.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Apr 2025 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 16:33:47 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Matt Fleming , willy@infradead.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luka.2016.cs@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu, Barry Song , kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Miklos Szeredi , Amir Goldstein , Dave Chinner , Qi Zheng , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song Subject: Re: Potential Linux Crash: WARNING in ext4_dirty_folio in Linux kernel v6.13-rc5 Message-ID: References: <20250326105914.3803197-1-matt@readmodwrite.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu 03-04-25 14:58:25, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 4/3/25 14:29, Matt Fleming wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:59 AM Matt Fleming wrote: > >> > >> Hi there, > > + Cc also Michal > > >> I'm also seeing this PF_MEMALLOC WARN triggered from kswapd in 6.12.19. > > We're talking about __alloc_pages_slowpath() doing WARN_ON_ONCE(current- > >flags & PF_MEMALLOC); for __GFP_NOFAIL allocations. > > kswapd() sets: > > tsk->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC | PF_KSWAPD; > > so any __GFP_NOFAIL allocation done in the kswapd context risks this > warning. It's also objectively bad IMHO because for direct reclaim we can > loop and hope kswapd rescues us, but kswapd would then have to rely on > direct reclaimers to get unstuck. I don't see an easy generic solution? Right. I do not think NOFAIL request from the reclaim context is really something we can commit to support. This really needs to be addressed on the shrinker side. > >> Does overlayfs need some kind of background inode reclaim support? > > > > Hey everyone, I know there was some off-list discussion last week at > > LSFMM, but I don't think a definite solution has been proposed for the > > below stacktrace. > > > > What is the shrinker API policy wrt memory allocation and I/O? Should > > overlayfs do something more like XFS and background reclaim to avoid > > GFP_NOFAIL > > allocations when kswapd is shrinking caches? > > > >> Call Trace: > >> > >> __alloc_pages_noprof+0x31c/0x330 > >> alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0xe3/0x1d0 > >> folio_alloc_noprof+0x5b/0xa0 > >> __filemap_get_folio+0x1f3/0x380 > >> __getblk_slow+0xa3/0x1e0 > >> __ext4_get_inode_loc+0x121/0x4b0 > >> ext4_get_inode_loc+0x40/0xa0 > >> ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x39/0xc0 > >> __ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x5b/0x220 > >> ext4_evict_inode+0x26d/0x690 > >> evict+0x112/0x2a0 > >> __dentry_kill+0x71/0x180 > >> dput+0xeb/0x1b0 > >> ovl_stack_put+0x2e/0x50 [overlay] > >> ovl_destroy_inode+0x3a/0x60 [overlay] > >> destroy_inode+0x3b/0x70 > >> __dentry_kill+0x71/0x180 > >> shrink_dentry_list+0x6b/0xe0 > >> prune_dcache_sb+0x56/0x80 > >> super_cache_scan+0x12c/0x1e0 > >> do_shrink_slab+0x13b/0x350 > >> shrink_slab+0x278/0x3a0 > >> shrink_node+0x328/0x880 > >> balance_pgdat+0x36d/0x740 > >> kswapd+0x1f0/0x380 > >> kthread+0xd2/0x100 > >> ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 > >> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 > >> > > -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs