From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
jlayton@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
swapnil.sapkal@amd.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 23:58:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-LEsPFE4e7TTMiY@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f855a988-d5e9-4f5a-8b49-891828367ed7@amd.com>
Thanks for the traces.
w/ revert
K Prateek Nayak wrote on Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:19:26PM +0530:
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618822: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_poll rd poll
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618822: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_request wr poll
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618823: p9_read_work: Data read wait 7
new behavior
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 95.011394: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_poll rd poll
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 95.011394: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_request wr poll
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 99.731970: p9_client_rpc: Wait event killable (-512)
For me the problem isn't so much that this gets ERESTARTSYS but that it
nevers gets to read the 7 bytes that are available?
If the repro has already written the bytes in both cases then there's no
reason to wait 5 seconds here...
OTOH syzbot 9p code is silly and might have been depending on something
that's not supposed to work e.g. they might be missing a flush or
equivalent for all I know (I still haven't looked at the repro)
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 15:54 [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter syzbot
2025-03-23 18:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:17 ` syzbot
2025-03-23 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-23 19:52 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 21:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 10:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 11:15 ` syzbot
2025-03-24 13:17 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 13:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 14:52 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 16:25 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 2:52 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 12:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 12:36 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-03-25 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 14:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 14:58 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2025-03-26 12:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 12:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 13:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-27 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-27 21:19 ` syzbot
2025-03-27 22:18 ` asmadeus
2025-03-28 4:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 4:43 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:07 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:49 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 14:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 15:22 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 17:56 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 0:00 ` asmadeus
2025-03-29 14:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 23:27 ` asmadeus
2025-03-30 10:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 20:43 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 18:14 ` David Howells
2025-03-28 18:44 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 19:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-08-03 12:09 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250323002028.3563-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23 1:15 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250323021219.3580-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23 2:48 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250324111613.3620-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-24 11:34 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-LEsPFE4e7TTMiY@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).