From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94B2E1DD539; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742989356; cv=none; b=lCBf3RTOV8PtOfXb1VvhgaicuTOze4HxQCyCl6cAbK1UACn6a39KeaxY/ny4b2JL7fo4qDnNmVWT6ytGa7R5lE8ySZdvygsEJaOt42Ex1Ry6M+78EY7DUUmcONjm9z0Vign3tp+hOvVJyOPhcpZgDUPj/hdP+nNmZEHZSQWq4nI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742989356; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v7ZMOO35vU/6iDB7/2yQJPgyi3G0An8BkvlxvSgQTZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IEVKj0ekmKnt4SCfV6pPN8H+B+G+7BvvkR6sGxap1t78lVmjZadMT3555XAqWdTf/ka/39yn9T0GUvn8JGCABoADW6+3Uj1SmAtOun4/m9wcH3u+7lKzgbDydqELra6SdfdXTj6XJrATMCkSXl3gEgHJj6GMHR0krqEoutTkxto= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fPPylndl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fPPylndl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B400FC4CEE2; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:42:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742989356; bh=v7ZMOO35vU/6iDB7/2yQJPgyi3G0An8BkvlxvSgQTZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fPPylndlVuEOOtsg+EFcIJOe5PBDJWrL6fLi5/Qisxgk/P/0J67tyFdPgzQH30NOz g8XAjtn1p9dYj8qEUaKF40fpFM6WDs0S7dOes1G5MrDTrFMFUpXfZSlUkXT78bVrRQ 5IfudNeyC8ynw3hXjW9+SEA+B9ykFreE+1g8aV2wuTJBEXD+sDZrACxgsrspg5Vv6/ l5bt9ynaSIgGx+ySvkl9ccplrBEW23gAy1UZGBNqRpdknyqvY7xr9pPscH1iwWEz2z LNvS3fswNpTtOOKljWo8D4Wd4F7yRG/TS+bOx8o1OhpTQLxmk8a+tm9HVzP5BmjXca uL1e8MJyvKUAg== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 04:42:34 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, david@fromorbit.com, rafael@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org, song@kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, amir73il@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] fs: automatic kernel fs freeze / thaw Message-ID: References: <20250326112220.1988619-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250326112220.1988619-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 04:22:14AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > I did a quick boot test with this on my laptop and suspend doesn't work, > its not clear if this was an artifact of me trying this on linux-next or > what, I can try without my patches on next to see if next actually > suspends without them. And so, we gotta figure out if there's something > stupid still to fix, or something broken with these changes I overlooked > on the rebase. next-20250321 has suspend broken, so it was not my patches which broke suspend. So we need baseline first on a kernel revision where it is not broken. Luis