From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84F414A82; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736353566; cv=none; b=LXDvLkUji01gf0X/EqNAseh7FHu/LooE3hXa3QV7LJzw+LF7zCTKNbdHgIf44K+cgzgW3Z/AQLz+EKEG85T47mq7srxbaXJgrw+jq0J4CjgcJ5VyrhrgryaQlyRR+uYlm4qkfWTGJo8qNOSeglU/3B/v2h/WNh7iOegD/O/UMaE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736353566; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q9ltSLrIoPAesJrmWVWqpAfai5DFPHIjAeg0/+UmCXs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aO7sBr3DzFYb0HfWh57rL0e2pJDZwKMp/1E/O2+HEXyl6oKjJL56PRgfAy0xnZ5cUJMhlo4swYIcC7v24wNNJQAURg/U5Hy6d1i7CKmJBlhW2BJ2Ih0h6s/aQ784mVQBuzCsxFG8oXKsXjxT+LfNmAfQ8D96g6+K73LlUGJPwTM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=GYi4Eyiy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GYi4Eyiy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=weWpNM3fKbzDtXKx1WecMn9tVZ8r3NqC8kWjrcpxoog=; b=GYi4EyiywAfM72Wy2ZB5y5FcJF wCU60p+4DHb9EkXf4MDN3ZgISwEZc1s4/+VSa0SvPUjY+1jdCiUENQ3ch8+MrwsOlF3LnR+zNBC0s w5cpV2J3x5Vbw0iSrOOhLJjq2Izk+8kkpggXP8w5Bzvu+bxM0YO/GCtPWnNRAgidyOtDKiGlsoF83 5Ss52MxM5fT5rMRvcZsIiAB5lZYM0tzH4Y+4oYI9jUSMR4Wub1eexEPiiagxsLH5+f0MqPV/Am8rj i54/XrmQiVUOI4YZIGajEWPj9jO6i36/MrApw7e2AMKVmnuKEoUgoqRgkGgx20dhmxtuKiNqc0Msg ZB0E83HQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tVYsW-00000001xkP-3OMp; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:25:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:25:56 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Liebes Wang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Bug: general protection fault in hfs_find_init Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:27:59PM +0800, Liebes Wang wrote: > Dear Linux maintainers and reviewers: We are all quite busy. Could you do some analysis rather than just saying "my tool found a bug"?