public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iomap: factor out iomap length helper
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:49:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4FdqZpGRokcyh96@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z390h2_8AmSQp_7R@infradead.org>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:02:31PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:36:06AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > In preparation to support more granular iomap iter advancing, factor
> > the pos/len values as parameters to length calculation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/iomap.h | 10 ++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > index 5675af6b740c..cbacccb3fb14 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > @@ -236,13 +236,19 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> >   *
> >   * Returns the length that the operation applies to for the current iteration.
> >   */
> > -static inline u64 iomap_length(const struct iomap_iter *iter)
> > +static inline u64 __iomap_length(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> > +		u64 len)
> 
> __iomap_length is not a a very good name for this, maybe something like
> iomap_cap_length?  Also please move the kerneldoc comment for
> iomap_length down to be next to it.
> 

Ok, seems reasonable, though I think I'd prefer something like
iomap_length_trim()..

Brian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-10 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13 14:36 [PATCH 0/6] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from " Brian Foster
2025-01-09  7:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-01-09  7:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:49     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-01-13  4:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-01-09  7:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:50     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-13  4:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:25         ` Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-01-09  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:51     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-15  5:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z4FdqZpGRokcyh96@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox