From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] iomap: factor out iomap length helper
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 12:49:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4FdqZpGRokcyh96@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z390h2_8AmSQp_7R@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:02:31PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:36:06AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > In preparation to support more granular iomap iter advancing, factor
> > the pos/len values as parameters to length calculation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/iomap.h | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > index 5675af6b740c..cbacccb3fb14 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > @@ -236,13 +236,19 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> > *
> > * Returns the length that the operation applies to for the current iteration.
> > */
> > -static inline u64 iomap_length(const struct iomap_iter *iter)
> > +static inline u64 __iomap_length(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> > + u64 len)
>
> __iomap_length is not a a very good name for this, maybe something like
> iomap_cap_length? Also please move the kerneldoc comment for
> iomap_length down to be next to it.
>
Ok, seems reasonable, though I think I'd prefer something like
iomap_length_trim()..
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-10 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 14:36 [PATCH 0/6] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from " Brian Foster
2025-01-09 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-01-09 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:49 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-01-13 4:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-01-09 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:50 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-13 4:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 14:25 ` Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-01-09 7:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 17:51 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-15 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2024-12-13 14:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4FdqZpGRokcyh96@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox