From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, tytso@mit.edu,
djwong@kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] dm: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:34:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6p_AsZy41XMCEh5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b1dcd45-efa6-4aad-9cd4-3302a29eb093@huaweicloud.com>
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 11:12:57AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> On 2025/2/8 6:14, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:46:33PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> >> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Set the BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP feature on stacking queue limits by
> >> default. This feature shall be disabled if any underlying device does
> >> not support it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> >> index bd8b796ae683..58cce31bcc1e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> >> @@ -598,7 +598,8 @@ int dm_split_args(int *argc, char ***argvp, char *input)
> >> static void dm_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *limits)
> >> {
> >> blk_set_stacking_limits(limits);
> >> - limits->features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT | BLK_FEAT_POLL;
> >> + limits->features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT | BLK_FEAT_POLL |
> >> + BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > dm_table_set_restrictions() can set limits->max_write_zeroes_sectors to
> > 0, and it's called after dm_calculate_queue_limits(), which calls
> > blk_stack_limits(). Just to avoid having the BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP
> > still set while a device's max_write_zeroes_sectors is 0, it seems like
> > you would want to clear it as well if dm_table_set_restrictions() sets
> > limits->max_write_zeroes_sectors to 0.
> >
>
> Hi, Ben!
>
> Yeah, right. Thanks for pointing this out, and I also checked other
> instances in dm where max_write_zeroes_sectors is set to 0, and it seems
> we should also clear BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP in
> disable_write_zeroes() as well.
Yep. Makes sense.
Thanks
-Ben
>
> Thanks,
> Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 11:46 [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] block: introduce BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to queue limits features Zhang Yi
2025-01-28 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 16:46 ` John Garry
2025-02-07 12:22 ` Zhang Yi
2025-02-07 12:31 ` Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] nvme: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports DEAC bit Zhang Yi
2025-01-28 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-07 12:24 ` Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] scsi: sd: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports unmap zeroing mode Zhang Yi
2025-01-28 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] dm: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support Zhang Yi
2025-02-07 22:14 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-02-08 3:12 ` Zhang Yi
2025-02-10 22:34 ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] fs: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to fallocate Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] block: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] block: factor out common part in blkdev_fallocate() Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support Zhang Yi
2025-01-15 21:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-01-16 3:04 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6p_AsZy41XMCEh5@redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox