From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] string: Disable read_word_at_a_time() optimizations if kernel MTE is enabled
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:55:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9Akv6qQFfmYFReD@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9AiUQdC4o0g8sxu@arm.com>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 11:45:21AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:37:32PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > I was worried that ex_handler_load_unaligned_zeropad() might not do the
> > right thing in response to a tag check fault (e.g. access the wrong 8
> > bytes), but it looks as though that's ok due to the way it generates the
> > offset and the aligned pointer.
> >
> > If load_unaligned_zeropad() is handed a string that starts with an
> > unexpected tag (and even if that starts off aligned),
> > ex_handler_load_unaligned_zeropad() will access that and cause another
> > tag check fault, which will be reported.
>
> Yes, it will report an async tag check fault on the
> exit_to_kernel_mode() path _if_ load_unaligned_zeropad() triggered the
> fault for other reasons (end of page).
Sorry, yes. The aligned case I mentioned shouldn't apply here.
> It's slightly inconsistent, we could set TCO for the async case in
> ex_handler_load_unaligned_zeropad() as well.
Yep, I think that'd be necessary for async mode.
> For sync checks, we'd get the first fault ending up in
> ex_handler_load_unaligned_zeropad() and a second tag check fault while
> processing the first. This ends up in do_tag_recovery and we disable
> tag checking after the report. Not ideal but not that bad.
Yep; that's what I was describing in the second paragraph above, though
I forgot to say that was assuming sync or asymm mode.
> We could adjust ex_handler_load_unaligned_zeropad() to return false if
> the pointer is already aligned but we need to check the semantics of
> load_unaligned_zeropad(), is it allowed to fault on the first byte?
IIUC today it's only expected to fault due to misalignment, and the
gneral expectation is that for a sequence of load_unaligned_zeropad()
calls, we should get at least one byte without faulting (for the NUL
terminator).
I reckon it'd be better to figure this out based on the ESR if possible.
Kristina's patches for MOPS would give us that.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-08 2:33 [PATCH] string: Disable read_word_at_a_time() optimizations if kernel MTE is enabled Peter Collingbourne
2025-03-08 3:36 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-10 17:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-10 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-10 18:13 ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-10 18:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-10 19:37 ` Mark Rutland
2025-03-11 11:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-11 11:55 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-03-18 21:41 ` Peter Collingbourne
2025-03-10 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9Akv6qQFfmYFReD@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).