From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 10/10] iomap: Rename ATOMIC flags again
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:49:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9KOItsOJykGzI-F@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3aeb1d0e-6c74-4bfe-914d-22ba4152bc7f@oracle.com>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 07:41:11AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> So how about this (I would re-add the write through comment):
This looks roughly sane. You'd probably want to turn the
iomap_dio_bio_opflags removal into a prep path, though.
> - blk_opf_t opflags = REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE;
This good lost and should move to the bio_opf declaration now.
> + (bdev_fua(iomap->bdev) || !bdev_write_cache(iomap->bdev))) {
> + bio_opf |= REQ_FUA; //reads as well?
REQ_FUA is not defined for reads in Linux Some of the storage standards
define it for reads, but the semantics are pretty nonsensical.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 18:39 [PATCH v5 00/10] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xfs: Pass flags to xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() John Garry
2025-03-12 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:19 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-03-12 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:21 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-03-12 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:27 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 15:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-12 22:06 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 23:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-13 1:25 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-13 4:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-13 6:11 ` John Garry
2025-03-18 0:43 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-13 7:21 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-22 5:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-12 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 9:13 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 14:48 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xfs: Iomap SW-based " John Garry
2025-03-12 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 9:00 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 14:57 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 16:11 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-03-12 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 9:04 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 13:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 15:01 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-03-11 14:40 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-03-12 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:09 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:14 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-03-12 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 8:05 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 14:47 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 16:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-12 16:28 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 18:39 ` [PATCH RFC v5 10/10] iomap: Rename ATOMIC flags again John Garry
2025-03-12 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 23:59 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-13 6:28 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 7:41 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-13 7:53 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 8:24 ` John Garry
2025-03-13 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9KOItsOJykGzI-F@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).