From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] SLOB+SLAB allocators removal and future SLUB improvements
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:06:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBBxXhvL/oS3uu5/@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b9fc9c6-b48c-198f-5f80-811a44737e5f@suse.cz>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The immediate benefit of that is that we can allow kfree() (and kfree_rcu())
> to free objects from kmem_cache_alloc() - something that IIRC at least xfs
> people wanted in the past, and SLOB was incompatible with that.
>
> For SLAB removal I haven't yet heard any objections (but also didn't
> deprecate it yet) but if there are any users due to particular workloads
> doing better with SLAB than SLUB, we can discuss why those would regress and
> what can be done about that in SLUB.
>
> Once we have just one slab allocator in the kernel, we can take a closer
> look at what the users are missing from it that forces them to create own
> allocators (e.g. BPF), and could be considered to be added as a generic
> implementation to SLUB.
With kfree() now working on kmem_cache_alloc(), I'd like to re-propose
the introduction of a generic free() function which can free any
allocated object. It starts out looking a lot like kvfree(), but
can be enhanced to cover other things ... here's a version I did from
2018 before giving up on it when I realised slob made it impossible:
+/**
+ * free() - Free memory
+ * @ptr: Pointer to memory
+ *
+ * This function can free almost any type of memory. It can safely be
+ * called on:
+ * * NULL pointers.
+ * * Pointers to read-only data (will do nothing).
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from kmalloc().
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from kmem_cache_alloc().
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from vmalloc().
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from alloc_percpu().
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from __get_free_pages().
+ * * Pointers to memory allocated from page_frag_alloc().
+ *
+ * It cannot free memory allocated by dma_pool_alloc() or dma_alloc_coherent().
+ */
+void free(const void *ptr)
+{
+ struct page *page;
+
+ if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ptr)))
+ return;
+ if (is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)ptr))
+ return;
+
+ page = virt_to_head_page(ptr);
+ if (likely(PageSlab(page)))
+ return kmem_cache_free(page->slab_cache, (void *)ptr);
+
+ if (is_vmalloc_addr(ptr))
+ return vfree(ptr);
+ if (is_kernel_percpu_address((unsigned long)ptr))
+ free_percpu((void __percpu *)ptr);
+ if (put_page_testzero(page))
+ __put_page(page);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(free);
Looking at it now, I'd also include a test for stack memory (and do
nothing if it is)
There are some prep patches that I'm not including here to clear out
the use of 'free' as a function name (some conflicting identifiers named
'free') and a fun one to set a SLAB_PAGE_DTOR on compound pages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-14 8:05 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] SLOB+SLAB allocators removal and future SLUB improvements Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-14 13:06 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-03-15 2:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-03-16 8:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-16 20:20 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-03-22 12:30 ` Binder Makin
2023-04-04 16:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-04-05 19:54 ` Binder Makin
2023-04-27 8:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-05-05 19:44 ` Binder Makin
[not found] ` <CAANmLtzajny8ZK_QKVYOxLc8L9gyWG6Uu7YyL-CR-qfwphVTzg@mail.gmail.com>
2023-03-22 13:02 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-03-22 13:24 ` Binder Makin
2023-03-22 13:30 ` Binder Makin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBBxXhvL/oS3uu5/@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).