linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zonefs: Always invalidate last cache page on append write
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 16:36:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCTLi+TByEjPIGg5@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46acc134-3f38-2a2d-c2aa-11d2fbee2abc@opensource.wdc.com>

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:27:43PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > But why does this not follow the logic in __iomap_dio_rw to to return
> > -ENOTBLK for any error so that the write falls back to buffered I/O.
> 
> This is a write to sequential zones so we cannot use buffered writes. We have to
> do a direct write to ensure ordering between writes.
> 
> Note that this is the special blocking write case where we issue a zone append.
> For async regular writes, we use iomap so this bug does not exist. But then I
> now realize that __iomap_dio_rw() falling back to buffered IOs could also create
> an issue with write ordering.

Can we add a comment please on why this is different?  And maybe bundle
the iomap-using path fix into the series while you're at it.

> > Also as far as I can tell from reading the code, -1 is not a valid
> > end special case for invalidate_inode_pages2_range, so you'll actually
> > have to pass a valid end here.
> 
> I wondered about that but then saw:
> 
> int invalidate_inode_pages2(struct address_space *mapping)
> {
> 	return invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping, 0, -1);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(invalidate_inode_pages2);
> 
> which tend to indicate that "-1" is fine. The end is passed to
> find_get_entries() -> find_get_entry() where it becomes a "max" pgoff_t, so
> using -1 seems fine.

Oh, indeed.  There's a little magic involved.  Still, any reason not to
pass the real end like iomap?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-29  5:58 [PATCH] zonefs: Always invalidate last cache page on append write Damien Le Moal
2023-03-29  6:14 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-03-29  8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-29  8:27   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-29  9:49     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-29 23:36     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-29 23:57       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30  0:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-30  0:22           ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-29 11:04 ` Hans Holmberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCTLi+TByEjPIGg5@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
    --cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).