* [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Sunsetting buffer_heads
@ 2023-04-12 10:18 Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-12 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2023-04-12 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Ceterum censeo ...
Having looked at implementing large blocksizes I constantly get bogged
down by buffer_heads and being as they are intricately linked into
filesystems and mm.
And also everyone seems to have agreed to phase out buffer_heads eventually.
So maybe it's time to start discussing exactly _how_ this could be done.
And LSF/MM seems to be the idea location for it.
So far I've came across the following issues:
- reading superblocks / bread(): maybe convert to ->read_folio() ?
- bh_lru and friends (maybe pointless once bread() has been converted)
- How to handle legacy filesystems still running on buffer_heads
I'm sure this is an incomplete list, and I'm equally sure that several
people have their own ideas what should or need to be done.
So this BOF will be about collecting these ideas and coming up with a
design how we can deprecated buffer_heads.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
Managing Directors: I. Totev, A. Myers, A. McDonald, M. B. Moerman
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Sunsetting buffer_heads
2023-04-12 10:18 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Sunsetting buffer_heads Hannes Reinecke
@ 2023-04-12 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-12 13:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2023-04-12 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Reinecke
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18:29PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Ceterum censeo ...
>
> Having looked at implementing large blocksizes I constantly get bogged down
> by buffer_heads and being as they are intricately linked into filesystems
> and mm.
>
> And also everyone seems to have agreed to phase out buffer_heads eventually.
>
> So maybe it's time to start discussing exactly _how_ this could be done.
> And LSF/MM seems to be the idea location for it.
>
> So far I've came across the following issues:
>
> - reading superblocks / bread(): maybe convert to ->read_folio() ?
> - bh_lru and friends (maybe pointless once bread() has been converted)
> - How to handle legacy filesystems still running on buffer_heads
>
> I'm sure this is an incomplete list, and I'm equally sure that several
> people have their own ideas what should or need to be done.
>
> So this BOF will be about collecting these ideas and coming up with a design
> how we can deprecated buffer_heads.
Might be worth reviewing this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230129044645.3cb2ayyxwxvxzhah@garbanzo/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Sunsetting buffer_heads
2023-04-12 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2023-04-12 13:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Reinecke @ 2023-04-12 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
On 4/12/23 15:16, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18:29PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Ceterum censeo ...
>>
>> Having looked at implementing large blocksizes I constantly get bogged down
>> by buffer_heads and being as they are intricately linked into filesystems
>> and mm.
>>
>> And also everyone seems to have agreed to phase out buffer_heads eventually.
>>
>> So maybe it's time to start discussing exactly _how_ this could be done.
>> And LSF/MM seems to be the idea location for it.
>>
>> So far I've came across the following issues:
>>
>> - reading superblocks / bread(): maybe convert to ->read_folio() ?
>> - bh_lru and friends (maybe pointless once bread() has been converted)
>> - How to handle legacy filesystems still running on buffer_heads
>>
>> I'm sure this is an incomplete list, and I'm equally sure that several
>> people have their own ideas what should or need to be done.
>>
>> So this BOF will be about collecting these ideas and coming up with a design
>> how we can deprecated buffer_heads.
>
> Might be worth reviewing this thread:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230129044645.3cb2ayyxwxvxzhah@garbanzo/
A-ha. So I'm not alone.
Please count me in in that session.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
Managing Directors: I. Totev, A. Myers, A. McDonald, M. B. Moerman
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-12 13:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-12 10:18 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Sunsetting buffer_heads Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-12 13:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-04-12 13:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).