From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 4/5] iomap: Allocate iop in ->write_begin() early
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:21:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGXD8T1Kv4NafQmO@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8401f45b8e441dc70effdb6b71fb67a3c92f837.1683485700.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:57:59AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Earlier when the folio is uptodate, we only allocate iop at writeback
s/Earlier/Currently/ ?
> time (in iomap_writepage_map()). This is ok until now, but when we are
> going to add support for per-block dirty state bitmap in iop, this
> could cause some performance degradation. The reason is that if we don't
> allocate iop during ->write_begin(), then we will never mark the
> necessary dirty bits in ->write_end() call. And we will have to mark all
> the bits as dirty at the writeback time, that could cause the same write
> amplification and performance problems as it is now.
>
> However, for all the writes with (pos, len) which completely overlaps
> the given folio, there is no need to allocate an iop during
> ->write_begin(). So skip those cases.
This reads a bit backwards, I'd suggest to mention early
allocation only happens for sub-page writes before going into the
details.
The changes themselves looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-07 19:27 [RFCv5 0/5] iomap: Add support for per-block dirty state to improve write performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 1/5] iomap: Rename iomap_page_create/release() to iop_alloc/free() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-18 6:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:01 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 2/5] iomap: Refactor iop_set_range_uptodate() function Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-15 15:09 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 10:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-18 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:03 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 3/5] iomap: Add iop's uptodate state handling functions Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-15 15:10 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 10:14 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-18 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:07 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 4/5] iomap: Allocate iop in ->write_begin() early Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-18 6:21 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-05-19 15:18 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-19 15:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22 4:05 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:28 ` [RFCv5 5/5] iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
[not found] ` <CGME20230515081618eucas1p1c852fec3ba7a42ee7094248c30ff5978@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-05-15 8:16 ` Pankaj Raghav
2023-05-15 8:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-15 13:23 ` Pankaj Raghav
2023-05-15 15:15 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 14:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-16 19:29 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-17 15:20 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-17 18:48 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-18 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22 4:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-22 4:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22 11:18 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-23 12:15 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 13:43 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 14:44 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 15:02 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 15:22 ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 15:38 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 15:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-18 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 16:08 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGXD8T1Kv4NafQmO@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).