linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>,
	Aravinda Herle <araherle@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 5/5] iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGzixaCEwGyNfPJR@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZGzaOSvpCAUsluhr@bfoster>

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:22:33AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> That is a prepatory patch before iop dirty tracking is enabled in patch
> 5, right? I was mainly just suggesting to make the overwrite checking
> part of this patch come after dirty tracking is enabled (as a small
> optimization patch) rather than before.
> 
> I don't want to harp on it if that's difficult or still doesn't make
> sense for some reason. I'll take a closer look the next go around when I
> have a bit more time and just send a diff if it seems it can be done
> cleanly..

Honestly, I think the way the patchset is structured now is fine.
There are always multiple ways to structure a set of patches, and I don't
think we need be too concerned about what order the things are done in,
as long as they get done.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-07 19:27 [RFCv5 0/5] iomap: Add support for per-block dirty state to improve write performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 1/5] iomap: Rename iomap_page_create/release() to iop_alloc/free() Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-18  6:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:01     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 2/5] iomap: Refactor iop_set_range_uptodate() function Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-15 15:09   ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 10:12     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-18  6:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:03     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 3/5] iomap: Add iop's uptodate state handling functions Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-15 15:10   ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 10:14     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-18  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:07     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23  6:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-07 19:27 ` [RFCv5 4/5] iomap: Allocate iop in ->write_begin() early Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-05-18  6:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 15:18     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-19 15:53       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22  4:05         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-07 19:28 ` [RFCv5 5/5] iomap: Add per-block dirty state tracking to improve performance Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
     [not found]   ` <CGME20230515081618eucas1p1c852fec3ba7a42ee7094248c30ff5978@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-05-15  8:16     ` Pankaj Raghav
2023-05-15  8:31       ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-15 13:23         ` Pankaj Raghav
2023-05-15 15:15   ` Brian Foster
2023-05-16 14:49     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-16 19:29       ` Brian Foster
2023-05-17 15:20         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-17 18:48           ` Brian Foster
2023-05-18 13:23             ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-18 16:15               ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22  4:33                 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-22  4:48                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-05-22 11:18                   ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23  0:56                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-05-23 12:15                       ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 13:43                         ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 14:44                           ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 15:02                             ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 15:22                               ` Brian Foster
2023-05-23 15:38                                 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-05-23 15:59                                 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-05-18 13:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-19 16:08     ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZGzixaCEwGyNfPJR@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=araherle@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).