From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14A0C7EE2D for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242270AbjEZIPH (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2023 04:15:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236850AbjEZIPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 May 2023 04:15:05 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E584D9; Fri, 26 May 2023 01:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/LDnVeeKch0nDkcJiHzeVDWqC1m/deVrVItZ5d48J7o=; b=dAbz9GGYrExV5edRPunAjolEZQ WFKsZKWAZJnuLleTCz/VVj+eXCWAn8UxjUjoZM/uAJnWTkKaLYj0udaFwvKzQ8zaCuAkZr3AjAbAq W31Grs1G99VSdxdCeYMCpfMXju0ATeHlGmheau2YJMbkEiC+AsOWFt+whU13yilOPwQtnGgVNMANc 0W1EPe+6LJLc659gPmJ0Tjb51SF8xSxiMdKnvVKN//GdqK+ZA5DAt3Nm+qkt7Djn7OnCOzUHFXXbo j74Mbl5MTGc3hdGMXXDolWqxh1kGOK8vTtJceJFTxtd3DsAm0QXgMIU497B2hgLaTZ9mFJsGDcFh/ 5YpoXT+g==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q2Sb9-001ZLi-1W; Fri, 26 May 2023 08:14:55 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 01:14:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, rohan.puri@samsung.com, rpuri.linux@gmail.com, a.manzanares@samsung.com, dave@stgolabs.net, yosryahmed@google.com, keescook@chromium.org, hare@suse.de, kbusch@kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/8] add support for blocksize > PAGE_SIZE Message-ID: References: <20230526075552.363524-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230526075552.363524-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:55:44AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > This is an initial attempt to add support for block size > PAGE_SIZE for tmpfs. The concept of a block size doesn't make any sense for tmpfs. What are you actually trying to do here?