From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492E3C77B7A for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 23:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229501AbjE2Xva (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2023 19:51:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44096 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229478AbjE2Xv3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2023 19:51:29 -0400 Received: from out-21.mta1.migadu.com (out-21.mta1.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:203:375::15]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E0DC9 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 16:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 19:51:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1685404285; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZMyH5ywG95dJvqFxeP9ZoI1z8D8zSKJF9jm0WDtx81o=; b=bDvlAjngnw8S8QDdRW3x/tnFNMBnKbLP4KSPE0BX6iLVTLgGFQsHLt6xWQWcXPWL+T3HsU Xrpis5AsEDWlIDEdhxC9r+hDytGJO2x5gRhI5LhXe6WKT3cGzxLNhxSPbBPrsjfsxu2Azy 2W2k1/Ze5SA79btwwFF32DjntsQOSaM= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Kent Overstreet To: Dave Chinner Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Mikulas Patocka , linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fuzzing bcachefs with dm-flakey Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:12:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Perhaps it is worthwhile running the same tests on btrfs so we can > something to compare the bcachefs behaviour to. I suspect that btrfs > will fair little better on the single device, no checksums > corruption test.... It's also a test we _should_ be doing much, much better on: we've got validation code for every key type that we run on every metadata read, so there's no excuses for thees bugs and they will be fixed. Just a question of when and in what order...