From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, lkp@intel.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [linus:master] [iomap] 219580eea1: ltp.writev07.fail
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:34:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLAZn_SBmoIFG5F5@yuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230713150923.GA28246@lst.de>
Hi!
> I can't reproduce this on current mainline. Is this a robust failure
> or flapping test? Especiall as the FAIL conditions look rather
> unrelated.
Actually the test is spot on, the difference is that previously the
error was returned form the iomap_file_buffered_write() only if we
failed with the first buffer from the iov, now we always return the
error and we do not advance the offset.
The change that broke it:
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 063133ec77f4..550525a525c4 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -864,16 +864,19 @@ iomap_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i,
.len = iov_iter_count(i),
.flags = IOMAP_WRITE,
};
- int ret;
+ ssize_t ret;
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
iter.flags |= IOMAP_NOWAIT;
while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
iter.processed = iomap_write_iter(&iter, i);
- if (iter.pos == iocb->ki_pos)
+
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0))
return ret;
- return iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos;
+ ret = iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos;
+ iocb->ki_pos += ret;
+ return ret;
}
I suppose that we shoudl fix is with something as:
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index adb92cdb24b0..bfb39f7bc303 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -872,11 +872,12 @@ iomap_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i,
while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
iter.processed = iomap_write_iter(&iter, i);
+ iocb->ki_pos += iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos;
+
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
return ret;
- ret = iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos;
- iocb->ki_pos += ret;
- return ret;
+
+ return iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_file_buffered_write);
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-13 13:25 [linus:master] [iomap] 219580eea1: ltp.writev07.fail kernel test robot
2023-07-13 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-13 15:34 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2023-07-13 15:56 ` [LTP] " Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-14 11:50 ` Jan Stancek
2023-07-14 11:53 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-07-13 15:12 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLAZn_SBmoIFG5F5@yuki \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).