* [PATCH 1/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_select()
@ 2023-07-16 1:07 Chao Yu
2023-07-16 1:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_sys_poll() Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2023-07-16 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, brauner, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Chao Yu
struct poll_wqueues table caused the stack usage of do_select() to
grow beyond the warning limit on 32-bit architectures w/ gcc.
fs/select.c: In function ‘do_select’:
fs/select.c:615:1: warning: the frame size of 1152 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
Allocating dynamic memory in do_select() to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/select.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 0ee55af1a55c..1b729494b4e9 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -479,23 +479,29 @@ static inline void wait_key_set(poll_table *wait, unsigned long in,
static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec64 *end_time)
{
ktime_t expire, *to = NULL;
- struct poll_wqueues table;
+ struct poll_wqueues *table;
poll_table *wait;
int retval, i, timed_out = 0;
u64 slack = 0;
__poll_t busy_flag = net_busy_loop_on() ? POLL_BUSY_LOOP : 0;
unsigned long busy_start = 0;
+ table = kmalloc(sizeof(struct poll_wqueues), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
rcu_read_lock();
retval = max_select_fd(n, fds);
rcu_read_unlock();
- if (retval < 0)
+ if (retval < 0) {
+ kfree(table);
return retval;
+ }
n = retval;
- poll_initwait(&table);
- wait = &table.pt;
+ poll_initwait(table);
+ wait = &table->pt;
if (end_time && !end_time->tv_sec && !end_time->tv_nsec) {
wait->_qproc = NULL;
timed_out = 1;
@@ -578,8 +584,8 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec64 *end_time)
wait->_qproc = NULL;
if (retval || timed_out || signal_pending(current))
break;
- if (table.error) {
- retval = table.error;
+ if (table->error) {
+ retval = table->error;
break;
}
@@ -604,12 +610,14 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec64 *end_time)
to = &expire;
}
- if (!poll_schedule_timeout(&table, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+ if (!poll_schedule_timeout(table, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
to, slack))
timed_out = 1;
}
- poll_freewait(&table);
+ poll_freewait(table);
+
+ kfree(table);
return retval;
}
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_sys_poll()
2023-07-16 1:07 [PATCH 1/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_select() Chao Yu
@ 2023-07-16 1:07 ` Chao Yu
2023-07-16 1:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2023-07-16 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, brauner, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Chao Yu
struct poll_wqueues table caused the stack usage of do_sys_poll() to
grow beyond the warning limit on 32-bit architectures w/ gcc.
fs/select.c: In function ‘do_sys_poll’:
fs/select.c:1053:1: warning: the frame size of 1328 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
Allocating dynamic memory in do_sys_poll() to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/select.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 1b729494b4e9..2b9db5c938d9 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static int do_poll(struct poll_list *list, struct poll_wqueues *wait,
static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
struct timespec64 *end_time)
{
- struct poll_wqueues table;
+ struct poll_wqueues *table;
int err = -EFAULT, fdcount, len;
/* Allocate small arguments on the stack to save memory and be
faster - use long to make sure the buffer is aligned properly
@@ -992,8 +992,14 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
struct poll_list *walk = head;
unsigned long todo = nfds;
- if (nfds > rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE))
- return -EINVAL;
+ table = kmalloc(sizeof(struct poll_wqueues), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (nfds > rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_table;
+ }
len = min_t(unsigned int, nfds, N_STACK_PPS);
for (;;) {
@@ -1019,9 +1025,9 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
}
}
- poll_initwait(&table);
- fdcount = do_poll(head, &table, end_time);
- poll_freewait(&table);
+ poll_initwait(table);
+ fdcount = do_poll(head, table, end_time);
+ poll_freewait(table);
if (!user_write_access_begin(ufds, nfds * sizeof(*ufds)))
goto out_fds;
@@ -1043,7 +1049,8 @@ static int do_sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
walk = walk->next;
kfree(pos);
}
-
+out_table:
+ kfree(table);
return err;
Efault:
--
2.40.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_sys_poll()
2023-07-16 1:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_sys_poll() Chao Yu
@ 2023-07-16 1:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2023-07-16 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu; +Cc: viro, brauner, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 09:07:14AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> struct poll_wqueues table caused the stack usage of do_sys_poll() to
> grow beyond the warning limit on 32-bit architectures w/ gcc.
>
> fs/select.c: In function ‘do_sys_poll’:
> fs/select.c:1053:1: warning: the frame size of 1328 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
That seems particularly high. But it's only 604 bytes, so half of the
stack frame:
struct poll_wqueues {
poll_table pt; /* 0 8 */
struct poll_table_page * table; /* 8 4 */
struct task_struct * polling_task; /* 12 4 */
int triggered; /* 16 4 */
int error; /* 20 4 */
int inline_index; /* 24 4 */
struct poll_table_entry inline_entries[18]; /* 28 576 */
/* size: 604, cachelines: 10, members: 7 */
/* last cacheline: 28 bytes */
};
Also, you can see it's deliberately sized to fit on the stack (see
include/linux/poll.h). So you're completely destroying that optimisation.
You need to figure out why the stack is now so big. This isn't the
right solution.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-16 1:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-16 1:07 [PATCH 1/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_select() Chao Yu
2023-07-16 1:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: select: reduce stack usage in do_sys_poll() Chao Yu
2023-07-16 1:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).