From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7193EC41513 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230129AbjG0XBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:01:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33594 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229528AbjG0XBq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:01:46 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF78894; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:01:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ejHA7FmenXKGQyWqGe1uUh0jEtBuCM0/1PLFM8OH3iw=; b=hTd+/S4/7TFQPhaXWdMsHxc4J5 tgm3Of1OlmnjvpvbW7qrGuwpdLMHMkcJIaMH6feS4f9zB4mQzXgQoLYFs4zpYkRNNNGx+/xtv6Wze md/BwO+TpOSTwm9hkU7nmhlYBagwt+zIQDdEQ3nYqHrR3ctOxgjbqDGZxU6Xrw7wbDIOFwGESoJbI uveMxe+J6gNi/hGO4bYX2n8Qhw9hcLAHc94Hp5BhU6wtSPb0egC3Qx3ZLpEtpge6xYhXhgfrIaysf Fk0WRQ/hWKI/Ht4OzLw3V+hNLlNJFZFKVgsvGtE+x7TqiAL8Iyf1l5gjMuQqIZM25NDcMG3SdEmnw LPsK+Fmw==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qP9zM-000qU2-0N; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 23:01:44 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:01:44 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Pankaj Raghav , Chandan Babu R Subject: Re: xfs kdevops baseline for next-20230725 Message-ID: References: <20230727225859.GF11352@frogsfrogsfrogs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230727225859.GF11352@frogsfrogsfrogs> Sender: Luis Chamberlain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:58:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:21:35AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > The sections tested for are: > > > > xfs_crc > > xfs_reflink > > xfs_reflink-normapbt > > xfs_reflink_1024 > > xfs_reflink_2k > > xfs_reflink_4k > > xfs_nocrc > > xfs_nocrc_512 > > xfs_nocrc_1k > > xfs_nocrc_2k > > xfs_nocrc_4k > > xfs_logdev > > xfs_rtdev > > xfs_rtlogdev > > Question: Have you turned on gcov to determine how much of fs/xfs/ and > fs/iomap/ are actually getting exercised by these configurations? Not yet, and it would somehow have to be the aggregate sum of the different guests, is that easy to sum up these days, given the same kernel is used? > I have for my fstests fleet; it's about ~90% for iomap, ~87% for > xfs/libxfs, ~84% for the pagecache, and ~80% for xfs/scrub. Was > wondering what everyone else got on the test. Neat, it's something we could automate provided if you already have a way to sum this up, dump it somehwere and we I can make a set of ansible tasks to do it. Luis