From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAEAEE49A9 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 03:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233383AbjHSDxa (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 23:53:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38206 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232793AbjHSDx3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 23:53:29 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A74421B; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:53:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=k+uWMHcD/UtEix/sGulCtsST6BuPB2WW6e/wqc+BshQ=; b=igEYJf8E84W5MJE8NgKQFUPp6v nvYWlL+4yQcdlQqWFSZ8+6jxn5lgE3AZl2+aGMAJeyXvDHDM7B3GCLGr0skKFpDyinXxOaIEnqUNO IcBx92z8rfILaHeupgs/Y7pxsEL/EOS5ROXOiAg3pd20ILhc9SLHTqC1V46gmvawPdc/iPd27pU1M 1JRLHpegQKbqu+xNCHh+ChVHahQAt6qCmCyecs8cjeRshBfj5zqPBtgiFUWozxHqxP0vENyG3Glc9 Lcp//6scRBQenT2XPBr9NDVga81mL8pQSHlOgDKB9y7a/pzjW8te6O0yzemwjQTQjHYFFqGj1CI0m nqg5ERaw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qXD1L-00DQDv-LS; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 03:53:03 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 04:53:03 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Hongchen Zhang Cc: David Howells , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Steve French , Jens Axboe , David Disseldorp , Luis Chamberlain , Nick Alcock , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock Message-ID: References: <20230811010309.20196-2-zhanghongchen@loongson.cn> <20230811010309.20196-1-zhanghongchen@loongson.cn> <3955287.1692002820@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 11:28:58AM +0800, Hongchen Zhang wrote: > Hi David, > > On 2023/8/14 pm 4:47, David Howells wrote: > > Hongchen Zhang wrote: > > > > > - spin_lock_irq(&pipe->rd_wait.lock); > > > + __pipe_lock(pipe); > > > I changed the code and the post_one_notification is not called inside spin > lock ,please check this patch again. In remove_watch_from_object(), you moved post_one_notification() before lock_queue(), but it's still called inside a RCU read-side critical section, which cannot sleep. Please test with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP before you send a new version. You should probably turn on DEBUG_SPINLOCK, LOCKDEP, DEBUG_MUTEXES and a few other debug options.