linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
	kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@fb.com,
	brauner@kernel.org, hare@suse.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
	rgoldwyn@suse.com, jack@suse.cz, ziy@nvidia.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com,
	da.gomez@samsung.com, dan.helmick@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/10] bdev: LBS devices support to coexist with buffer-heads
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:26:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQTaFqL3f5i3sVR6@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZQTR0NorkxJlcNBW@casper.infradead.org>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:51:12PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:32:44PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > However, an issue is that disabling CONFIG_BUFFER_HEAD in practice is not viable
> > for many Linux distributions since it also means disabling support for most
> > filesystems other than btrfs and XFS. So we either support larger order folios
> > on buffer-heads, or we draw up a solution to enable co-existence. Since at LSFMM
> > 2023 it was decided we would not support larger order folios on buffer-heads,
> 
> Um, I didn't agree to that.  If block size is equal to folio size, there
> are no problems supporting one buffer head per folio.  In fact, we could
> probably go up to 8 buffer heads per folio without any trouble (but I'm
> not signing up to do that work).

Patches welcomed for buffer-head larger order folio support :)

But in the meantime...

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-15 21:32 [RFC v2 00/10] bdev: LBS devices support to coexist with buffer-heads Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 01/10] bdev: rename iomap aops Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 02/10] bdev: dynamically set aops to enable LBS support Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 03/10] bdev: increase bdev max blocksize depending on the aops used Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 04/10] filesystems: add filesytem buffer-head flag Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 05/10] bdev: allow to switch between bdev aops Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 06/10] bdev: simplify coexistance Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 07/10] nvme: enhance max supported LBA format check Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 22:20   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-15 22:27     ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 08/10] nvme: add awun / nawun sanity check Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 09/10] nvme: add nvme_core.debug_large_atomics to force high awun as phys_bs Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:32 ` [RFC v2 10/10] nvme: enable LBS support Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-15 21:51 ` [RFC v2 00/10] bdev: LBS devices support to coexist with buffer-heads Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-15 22:26   ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2023-09-17 11:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-18 17:12   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-18 18:15     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-18 18:42       ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-17 22:38 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-17 23:14   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-18  0:59     ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-18  1:13       ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-18  2:49         ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-18 17:51           ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-09-18 11:34     ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQTaFqL3f5i3sVR6@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=dan.helmick@samsung.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).