linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH v12 00/33] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes
@ 2023-09-14  1:54 Sean Christopherson
  2023-09-14  1:54 ` [RFC PATCH v12 01/33] KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn ranges Sean Christopherson
                   ` (32 more replies)
  0 siblings, 33 replies; 76+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2023-09-14  1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Huacai Chen,
	Michael Ellerman, Anup Patel, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt,
	Albert Ou, Sean Christopherson, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle),
	Andrew Morton, Paul Moore, James Morris, Serge E. Hallyn
  Cc: kvm, linux-arm-kernel, kvmarm, linux-mips, linuxppc-dev,
	kvm-riscv, linux-riscv, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm,
	linux-security-module, linux-kernel, Chao Peng, Fuad Tabba,
	Jarkko Sakkinen, Anish Moorthy, Yu Zhang, Isaku Yamahata,
	Xu Yilun, Vlastimil Babka, Vishal Annapurve, Ackerley Tng,
	Maciej Szmigiero, David Hildenbrand, Quentin Perret, Michael Roth,
	Wang, Liam Merwick, Isaku Yamahata, Kirill A . Shutemov

This is hopefully the last RFC for implementing fd-based (instead of vma-based)
memory for KVM guests.  If you want the full background of why we are doing
this, please go read the v10 cover letter.  With luck, v13 will be a "normal"
series that's ready for inclusion.

Tagged RFC as there are still several empty changelogs, a lot of missing
documentation, and a handful of TODOs.  And I haven't tested or proofread this
anywhere near as much as I normally would.  I am posting even though the
remaining TODOs aren't _that_ big so that people can test this new version
without having to wait a few weeks to close out the remaining TODOs, i.e. to
give us at least some chance of hitting v6.7.

The most relevant TODO item for non-KVM folks is that we are planning on
dropping the dedicated "gmem" file system.  Assuming that pans out, the patch
to export security_inode_init_security_anon() should go away.

KVM folks, there a few changes I want to highlight and get feedback on, all of
which are directly related to the "annotated memory faults" series[*]:

 - Rename kvm_run.memory to kvm_run.memory_fault
 - Place "memory_fault" in a separate union
 - Return -EFAULT or -EHWPOISON with exiting with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT

The first one is pretty self-explanatory, "run->memory.gpa" looks quite odd and
would prevent ever doing something directly with memory.

Putting the struct in a separate union is not at all necessary for supporting
private memory, it's purely forward looking to Anish series, which wants to
annotate (fill memory_fault) on all faults, even if KVM ultimately doesn't exit
to userspace (x86 has a few unfortunate flows where KVM can clobber a previous
exit, or suppress a memory fault exit).  Using a separate union, i.e. different
bytes in kvm_run, allows exiting to userspace with both memory_fault and the
"normal" union filled, e.g. if KVM starts an MMIO exit and then hits a memory
fault exit, the MMIO exit will be preserved.  It's unlikely userspace will be
able to do anything useful with the info in that case, but the reverse will
likely be much more interesting, e.g. if KVM hits a memory fault and then doesn't
report it to userspace for whatever reason.

As for returning -EFAULT/-EHWPOISON, far too many helpers that touch guest
memory, i.e. can "fault", return 0 on success, which makes it all bug impossible
to use '0' to signal "exit to userspace".  Rather than use '0' for _just_ the
case where the guest is accessing private vs. shared, my thought is to use
-EFAULT everywhere except for the poisoned page case.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908222905.1321305-1-amoorthy@google.com

TODOs [owner]:
 - Documentation [none]
 - Changelogs [Sean]
 - Fully anonymous inode vs. proper filesystem [Paolo]
 - kvm_gmem_error_page() testing (my version is untested) [Isaku?]

v12:
 - Squash fixes from others. [Many people]
 - Kill of the .on_unlock() callback and use .on_lock() when handling
   memory attributes updates. [Isaku]
 - Add more tests. [Ackerley]
 - Move range_has_attrs() to common code. [Paolo]
 - Return actually number of address spaces for the VM-scoped version of
   KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE. [Paolo]
 - Move forward declaration of "struct kvm_gfn_range" to kvm_types.h. [Yuan]
 - Plumb code to have HVA-based mmu_notifier events affect only shared
   mappings. [Asish]
 - Clean up kvm_vm_ioctl_set_mem_attributes() math. [Binbin]
 - Collect a few reviews and acks. [Paolo, Paul]
 - Unconditionally advertise a synchronized MMU on PPC. [Paolo]
 - Check for error return from filemap_grab_folio(). [A
 - Make max_order optional. [Fuad]
 - Remove signal injection, zap SPTEs on memory error. [Isaku]
 - Add KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD. [Xiaoyao]
 - Invoke kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes() instead of
   kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range().
 - Rename kvm_run.memory to kvm_run.memory_fault
 - Place "memory_fault" in a separate union
 - Return -EFAULT and -EHWPOISON with KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT
 - "Init" run->exit_reason in x86's vcpu_run()

v11:
 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230718234512.1690985-1-seanjc@google.com
 - Test private<=>shared conversions *without* doing fallocate()
 - PUNCH_HOLE all memory between iterations of the conversion test so that
   KVM doesn't retain pages in the guest_memfd
 - Rename hugepage control to be a very generic ALLOW_HUGEPAGE, instead of
   giving it a THP or PMD specific name.
 - Fold in fixes from a lot of people (thank you!)
 - Zap SPTEs *before* updating attributes to ensure no weirdness, e.g. if
   KVM handles a page fault and looks at inconsistent attributes
 - Refactor MMU interaction with attributes updates to reuse much of KVM's
   framework for mmu_notifiers.

v10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202061347.1070246-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com

Ackerley Tng (1):
  KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access

Chao Peng (8):
  KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry
  KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace
  KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes
  KVM: x86: Disallow hugepages when memory attributes are mixed
  KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory
  KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 helper
  KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate
    guest_memfd()
  KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd()

Sean Christopherson (21):
  KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn
    ranges
  KVM: PPC: Drop dead code related to KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
  KVM: PPC: Return '1' unconditionally for KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU
  KVM: Convert KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER to
    CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
  KVM: Introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2
  KVM: Add a dedicated mmu_notifier flag for reclaiming freed memory
  KVM: Drop .on_unlock() mmu_notifier hook
  KVM: Set the stage for handling only shared mappings in mmu_notifier
    events
  mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable
  security: Export security_inode_init_security_anon() for use by KVM
  KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing
    memory
  KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory
  KVM: x86: "Reset" vcpu->run->exit_reason early in KVM_RUN
  KVM: Drop superfluous __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE macro
  KVM: Allow arch code to track number of memslot address spaces per VM
  KVM: x86: Add support for "protected VMs" that can utilize private
    memory
  KVM: selftests: Drop unused kvm_userspace_memory_region_find() helper
  KVM: selftests: Convert lib's mem regions to
    KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2
  KVM: selftests: Add support for creating private memslots
  KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM
    type
  KVM: selftests: Add GUEST_SYNC[1-6] macros for synchronizing more data

Vishal Annapurve (3):
  KVM: selftests: Add helpers to convert guest memory b/w private and
    shared
  KVM: selftests: Add helpers to do KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercalls
    (x86)
  KVM: selftests: Add x86-only selftest for private memory conversions

 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst                | 116 ++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h             |   2 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig                        |   2 +-
 arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h              |   2 -
 arch/mips/kvm/Kconfig                         |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h           |   2 -
 arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig                      |   8 +-
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c                  |   2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c                    |   7 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h             |   2 -
 arch/riscv/kvm/Kconfig                        |   2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h               |  17 +-
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h               |   3 +
 arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig                          |  14 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/debugfs.c                        |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                        | 264 +++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h               |   2 +
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c                    |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                        |  11 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |  25 +-
 include/linux/kvm_host.h                      | 143 +++-
 include/linux/kvm_types.h                     |   1 +
 include/linux/pagemap.h                       |  19 +-
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                      |  67 ++
 include/uapi/linux/magic.h                    |   1 +
 mm/compaction.c                               |  43 +-
 mm/migrate.c                                  |   2 +
 security/security.c                           |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   3 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c  |   2 +-
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c  | 165 +++++
 .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h     | 148 +++-
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h |   5 +
 .../selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h      |  11 +
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  |  15 +
 .../selftests/kvm/kvm_page_table_test.c       |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c    | 231 ++++---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/memstress.c   |   3 +-
 .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c    | 100 +++
 .../kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c | 410 +++++++++++
 .../kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c   | 121 ++++
 .../kvm/x86_64/ucna_injection_test.c          |   2 +-
 virt/kvm/Kconfig                              |  17 +
 virt/kvm/Makefile.kvm                         |   1 +
 virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c                         |   2 +-
 virt/kvm/guest_mem.c                          | 637 ++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                           | 482 +++++++++++--
 virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h                             |  38 ++
 48 files changed, 2888 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_conversions_test.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_kvm_exits_test.c
 create mode 100644 virt/kvm/guest_mem.c


base-commit: 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d
-- 
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v12 11/33] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes
@ 2023-10-05 14:42 Fuad Tabba
  2023-10-06  3:21 ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 76+ messages in thread
From: Fuad Tabba @ 2023-10-05 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sean Christopherson
  Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Huacai Chen,
	Michael Ellerman, Anup Patel, Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt,
	Albert Ou, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle), Andrew Morton, Paul Moore,
	James Morris, Serge E. Hallyn, KVM,
	moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE), KVMARM,
	LinuxMIPS, linuxppc-dev, kvm-riscv, linux-riscv, linux-fsdevel,
	linux-mm, linux-security-module, open list, Chao Peng,
	Jarkko Sakkinen, Anish Moorthy, Yu Zhang, Isaku Yamahata,
	Xu Yilun, Vlastimil Babka, Vishal Annapurve, Ackerley Tng,
	Maciej Szmigiero, David Hildenbrand, Quentin Perret, Michael Roth,
	Wang, Liam Merwick, Isaku Yamahata, Kirill A . Shutemov

Hi Sean,

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 9:51 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:59 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > > > > +#define KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE           (1ULL << 3)
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > In pKVM, we don't want to allow setting (or clearing) of PRIVATE/SHARED
> > > > attributes from userspace.
> > >
> > > Why not?  The whole thing falls apart if userspace doesn't *know* the state of a
> > > page, and the only way for userspace to know the state of a page at a given moment
> > > in time is if userspace controls the attributes.  E.g. even if KVM were to provide
> > > a way for userspace to query attributes, the attributes exposed to usrspace would
> > > become stale the instant KVM drops slots_lock (or whatever lock protects the attributes)
> > > since userspace couldn't prevent future changes.
> >
> > I think I might not quite understand the purpose of the
> > KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES ABI. In pKVM, all of a protected guest's memory is
> > private by default, until the guest shares it with the host (via a
> > hypercall), or another guest (future work). When the guest shares it,
> > userspace is notified via KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL. In many use cases, userspace
> > doesn't need to keep track directly of all of this, but can reactively un/map
> > the memory being un/shared.
>
> Yes, and then userspace needs to tell KVM, via KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, that
> userspace has agreed to change the state of the page.  Userspace may not need/want
> to explicitly track the state of pages, but userspace still needs to tell KVM what
> userspace wants.
>
> KVM is primarily an accelerator, e.g. KVM's role is to make things go fast (relative
> to doing things in userspace) and provide access to resources/instructions that
> require elevated privileges.  As a general rule, we try to avoid defining the vCPU
> model, security policies, etc. in KVM, because hardcoding policy into KVM (and the
> kernel as a whole) eventually limits the utility of KVM.
>
> As it pertains to PRIVATE vs. SHARED, KVM's role is to define and enforce the basic
> rules, but KVM shouldn't do things like define when it is (il)legal to convert
> memory to/from SHARED, what pages can be converted, what happens if the guest and
> userspace disagree, etc.

Thanks for clarifying that. My initial understanding of the purpose of
KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES wasn't clear. Now I see how having the
userspace view in KVM would avoid the need to hardcore many policies,
and I can see how this could come in handy in the future when we start
going into multi-sharing, for example.

> > > Why does pKVM need to prevent userspace from stating *its* view of attributes?
> > >
> > > If the goal is to reduce memory overhead, that can be solved by using an internal,
> > > non-ABI attributes flag to track pKVM's view of SHARED vs. PRIVATE.  If the guest
> > > attempts to access memory where pKVM and userspace don't agree on the state,
> > > generate an exit to userspace.  Or kill the guest.  Or do something else entirely.
> >
> > For the pKVM hypervisor the guest's view of the attributes doesn't
> > matter. The hypervisor at the end of the day is the ultimate arbiter
> > for what is shared and with how. For pKVM (at least in my port of
> > guestmem), we use the memory attributes from guestmem essentially to
> > control which memory can be mapped by the host.
>
> The guest's view absolutely matters.  The guest's view may not be expressed at
> access time, e.g. as you note below, pKVM and other software-protected VMs don't
> have a dedicated shared vs. private bit like TDX and SNP.  But the view is still
> there, e.g. in the pKVM model, the guest expresses its desire for shared vs.
> private via hypercall, and IIRC, the guest's view is tracked by the hypervisor
> in the stage-2 PTEs.  pKVM itself may track the guest's view on things, but the
> view is still the guest's.

This was poorly worded on my part. You're right that in practice the
pKVM hypervisor is the one tracking the guest's view, based on the
hypercalls from the guest.

> E.g. if the guest thinks a page is private, but in reality KVM and host userspace
> have it as shared, then the guest may unintentionally leak data to the untrusted
> world.
>
> IIUC, you have implemented guest_memfd support in pKVM by changing the attributes
> when the guest makes the hypercall.  This can work, but only so long as the guest
> and userspace are well-behaved, and it will likely paint pKVM into a corner in
> the long run.
>
> E.g. if the guest makes a hypercall to convert memory to PRIVATE, but there is
> no memslot or the memslot doesn't support private memory, then unless there is
> policy baked into KVM, or an ABI for the guest<=>host hypercall interface that
> allows unwinding the program counter, you're stuck.  Returning an error for the
> hypercall straight from KVM is undesirable as that would put policy into KVM that
> doesn't need to be there, e.g. that would prevent userspace from manipulating
> memslots in response to (un)share requests from the guest.  It's a similar story
> if KVM marks the page as PRIVATE, as that would prevent userspace from returning
> an error for the hypercall, i.e. would prevent usersepace from denying the request
> to convert to PRIVATE.

Ack.

> > One difference between pKVM and TDX (as I understand it), is that TDX
> > uses the msb of the guest's IPA to indicate whether memory is shared
> > or private, and that can generate a mismatch on guest memory access
> > between what it thinks the state is, and what the sharing state in
> > reality is. pKVM doesn't have that. Memory is private by default, and
> > can be shared in-place, both in the guest's IPA space as well as the
> > underlying physical page.
>
> TDX's shared bit and SNP's encryption bit are just a means of hardware enforcement.
> pKVM does have a hardware bit because hardware doesn't provide any enforcement.
> But as above, pKVM does have an equivalent *somewhere*.
>
> > > > The other thing, which we need for pKVM anyway, is to make
> > > > kvm_vm_set_mem_attributes() global, so that it can be called from outside of
> > > > kvm_main.c (already have a local patch for this that declares it in
> > > > kvm_host.h),
> > >
> > > That's no problem, but I am definitely opposed to KVM modifying attributes that
> > > are owned by userspace.
> > >
> > > > and not gate this function by KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES.
> > >
> > > As above, I am opposed to pKVM having a completely different ABI for managing
> > > PRIVATE vs. SHARED.  I have no objection to pKVM using unclaimed flags in the
> > > attributes to store extra metadata, but if KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES doesn't work
> > > for pKVM, then we've failed miserably and should revist the uAPI.
> >
> > Like I said, pKVM doesn't need a userspace ABI for managing PRIVATE/SHARED,
> > just a way of tracking in the host kernel of what is shared (as opposed to
> > the hypervisor, which already has the knowledge). The solution could simply
> > be that pKVM does not enable KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, has its own
> > tracking of the status of the guest pages, and only selects KVM_PRIVATE_MEM.
>
> At the risk of overstepping my bounds, I think that effectively giving the guest
> full control over what is shared vs. private is a mistake.  It more or less locks
> pKVM into a single model, and even within that model, dealing with errors and/or
> misbehaving guests becomes unnecessarily problematic.
>
> Using KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES may not provide value *today*, e.g. the userspace
> side of pKVM could simply "reflect" all conversion hypercalls, and terminate the
> VM on errors.  But the cost is very minimal, e.g. a single extra ioctl() per
> converion, and the upside is that pKVM won't be stuck if a use case comes along
> that wants to go beyond "all conversion requests either immediately succeed or
> terminate the guest".

Now that I understand the purpose of KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, I
agree. However, pKVM needs to track at the host kernel (i.e., EL1)
whether guest memory is shared or private.

One approach would be to add another flag to the attributes that
tracks the host kernel view. The way KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES is
implemented now, userspace can zero it, so in that case, that
operation would need to be masked to avoid that.

Another approach would be to have a pKVM-specific xarray (or similar)
to do the tracking, but since there is a structure that's already
doing something similar (i.e.,the attributes array), it seems like it
would be unnecessary overhead.

Do you have any ideas or preferences?

Cheers,
/fuad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 76+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-09 16:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-14  1:54 [RFC PATCH v12 00/33] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:54 ` [RFC PATCH v12 01/33] KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn ranges Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  6:47   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-09-15 21:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 02/33] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  3:07   ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-14 14:19     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-20  6:07   ` Xu Yilun
2023-09-20 13:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21  2:39       ` Xu Yilun
2023-09-21 14:24         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 03/33] KVM: PPC: Drop dead code related to KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 04/33] KVM: PPC: Return '1' unconditionally for KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 05/33] KVM: Convert KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-10-09 16:42   ` Anup Patel
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 06/33] KVM: Introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  6:59   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 07/33] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace Sean Christopherson
2023-09-22  6:03   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-09-22 14:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 08/33] KVM: Add a dedicated mmu_notifier flag for reclaiming freed memory Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 09/33] KVM: Drop .on_unlock() mmu_notifier hook Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 10/33] KVM: Set the stage for handling only shared mappings in mmu_notifier events Sean Christopherson
2023-09-18  1:14   ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-18 15:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-18 18:07   ` Michael Roth
2023-09-19  0:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 11/33] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  6:32   ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-20 21:00     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21  1:21       ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-25 17:37         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-18  7:51   ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-20 21:03     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-27  5:19       ` Binbin Wu
2023-10-03 12:47   ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-03 15:59     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-03 18:33       ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-03 20:51         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 12/33] mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 13/33] security: Export security_inode_init_security_anon() for use by KVM Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 14/33] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  6:11   ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-18 16:36   ` Michael Roth
2023-09-20 23:44     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-19  9:01   ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-20 14:24     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21  5:58       ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-21 19:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 15/33] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 16/33] KVM: x86: "Reset" vcpu->run->exit_reason early in KVM_RUN Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 17/33] KVM: x86: Disallow hugepages when memory attributes are mixed Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 18/33] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-09-15  5:40   ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-15 14:26     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-18  0:54       ` Yan Zhao
2023-09-21 14:59         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-21  5:51       ` Binbin Wu
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 19/33] KVM: Drop superfluous __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE macro Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 20/33] KVM: Allow arch code to track number of memslot address spaces per VM Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 21/33] KVM: x86: Add support for "protected VMs" that can utilize private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 22/33] KVM: selftests: Drop unused kvm_userspace_memory_region_find() helper Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 23/33] KVM: selftests: Convert lib's mem regions to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 24/33] KVM: selftests: Add support for creating private memslots Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 25/33] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to convert guest memory b/w private and shared Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 26/33] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to do KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercalls (x86) Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 27/33] KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM type Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 28/33] KVM: selftests: Add GUEST_SYNC[1-6] macros for synchronizing more data Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 29/33] KVM: selftests: Add x86-only selftest for private memory conversions Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 30/33] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 helper Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 31/33] KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 32/33] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-09-14  1:55 ` [RFC PATCH v12 33/33] KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access Sean Christopherson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-05 14:42 [RFC PATCH v12 11/33] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes Fuad Tabba
2023-10-06  3:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-06 12:47   ` Fuad Tabba

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).