From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3B4E548; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FA18C433C7; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:57:12 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Joey Gouly Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, broonie@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/25] arm64: enable POE and PIE to coexist Message-ID: References: <20231124163510.1835740-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> <20231124163510.1835740-18-joey.gouly@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231124163510.1835740-18-joey.gouly@arm.com> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:35:02PM +0000, Joey Gouly wrote: > Set the EL0/userspace indirection encodings to be the overlay enabled > variants of the permissions. > > Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h > index e9624f6326dd..3007208e04aa 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h > @@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ extern bool arm64_use_ng_mappings; > > #define PIE_E0 ( \ > PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_EXECONLY), PIE_X_O) | \ > - PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_READONLY_EXEC), PIE_RX) | \ > - PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_SHARED_EXEC), PIE_RWX) | \ > - PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_READONLY), PIE_R) | \ > - PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_SHARED), PIE_RW)) > + PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_READONLY_EXEC), PIE_RX_O) | \ > + PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_SHARED_EXEC), PIE_RWX_O) | \ > + PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_READONLY), PIE_R_O) | \ > + PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_SHARED), PIE_RW_O)) > > #define PIE_E1 ( \ > PIRx_ELx_PERM(pte_pi_index(_PAGE_EXECONLY), PIE_NONE_O) | \ Don't we need to do this for PIE_E1? Or we consider the futex (LDXR/STXR) accesses not checked by POE? That's fine by me if we go this route but we should document it. The alternative is to enable overlay variants in PIE_E1 but we need to reserve a POE key for the kernel to use. -- Catalin