linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
	jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	jaswin@linux.ibm.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] block: Add atomic write operations to request_queue limits
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:25:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXkIEnQld577uHqu@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212110844.19698-2-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:08:29AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> From: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> 
> Add the following limits:
> - atomic_write_boundary_bytes
> - atomic_write_max_bytes
> - atomic_write_unit_max_bytes
> - atomic_write_unit_min_bytes
> 
> All atomic writes limits are initialised to 0 to indicate no atomic write
> support. Stacked devices are just not supported either for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> #jpg: Heavy rewrite
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  block/blk-settings.c                 | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  block/blk-sysfs.c                    | 33 +++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/blkdev.h               | 37 +++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> index 1fe9a553c37b..ba81a081522f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> @@ -21,6 +21,53 @@ Description:
>  		device is offset from the internal allocation unit's
>  		natural alignment.
>  
> +What:		/sys/block/<disk>/atomic_write_max_bytes
> +Date:		May 2023
> +Contact:	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> +Description:
> +		[RO] This parameter specifies the maximum atomic write
> +		size reported by the device. This parameter is relevant
> +		for merging of writes, where a merged atomic write
> +		operation must not exceed this number of bytes.
> +		The atomic_write_max_bytes may exceed the value in
> +		atomic_write_unit_max_bytes if atomic_write_max_bytes
> +		is not a power-of-two or atomic_write_unit_max_bytes is
> +		limited by some queue limits, such as max_segments.
> +
> +
> +What:		/sys/block/<disk>/atomic_write_unit_min_bytes
> +Date:		May 2023
> +Contact:	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> +Description:
> +		[RO] This parameter specifies the smallest block which can
> +		be written atomically with an atomic write operation. All
> +		atomic write operations must begin at a
> +		atomic_write_unit_min boundary and must be multiples of
> +		atomic_write_unit_min. This value must be a power-of-two.
> +
> +
> +What:		/sys/block/<disk>/atomic_write_unit_max_bytes
> +Date:		January 2023
> +Contact:	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> +Description:
> +		[RO] This parameter defines the largest block which can be
> +		written atomically with an atomic write operation. This
> +		value must be a multiple of atomic_write_unit_min and must
> +		be a power-of-two.
> +
> +
> +What:		/sys/block/<disk>/atomic_write_boundary_bytes
> +Date:		May 2023
> +Contact:	Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> +Description:
> +		[RO] A device may need to internally split I/Os which
> +		straddle a given logical block address boundary. In that
> +		case a single atomic write operation will be processed as
> +		one of more sub-operations which each complete atomically.
> +		This parameter specifies the size in bytes of the atomic
> +		boundary if one is reported by the device. This value must
> +		be a power-of-two.
> +
>  
>  What:		/sys/block/<disk>/diskseq
>  Date:		February 2021
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 0046b447268f..d151be394c98 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
>  	lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE;
>  	lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
>  	lim->dma_alignment = 511;
> +	lim->atomic_write_unit_min_sectors = 0;
> +	lim->atomic_write_unit_max_sectors = 0;
> +	lim->atomic_write_max_sectors = 0;
> +	lim->atomic_write_boundary_sectors = 0;

Can we move the four into single structure and setup them in single
API? Then cross-validation can be done in this API.

>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -183,6 +187,62 @@ void blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_discard_sectors);
>  
> +/**
> + * blk_queue_atomic_write_max_bytes - set max bytes supported by
> + * the device for atomic write operations.
> + * @q:  the request queue for the device
> + * @size: maximum bytes supported
> + */
> +void blk_queue_atomic_write_max_bytes(struct request_queue *q,
> +				      unsigned int bytes)
> +{
> +	q->limits.atomic_write_max_sectors = bytes >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_atomic_write_max_bytes);

What if driver doesn't call it but driver supports atomic write?

I guess the default max sectors should be atomic_write_unit_max_sectors
if the feature is enabled.

> +
> +/**
> + * blk_queue_atomic_write_boundary_bytes - Device's logical block address space
> + * which an atomic write should not cross.
> + * @q:  the request queue for the device
> + * @bytes: must be a power-of-two.
> + */
> +void blk_queue_atomic_write_boundary_bytes(struct request_queue *q,
> +					   unsigned int bytes)
> +{
> +	q->limits.atomic_write_boundary_sectors = bytes >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_atomic_write_boundary_bytes);

Default atomic_write_boundary_sectors should be
atomic_write_unit_max_sectors in case of atomic write?

> +
> +/**
> + * blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_min_sectors - smallest unit that can be written
> + * atomically to the device.
> + * @q:  the request queue for the device
> + * @sectors: must be a power-of-two.
> + */
> +void blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_min_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
> +					     unsigned int sectors)
> +{
> +	struct queue_limits *limits = &q->limits;
> +
> +	limits->atomic_write_unit_min_sectors = sectors;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_min_sectors);

atomic_write_unit_min_sectors should be >= (physical block size >> 9)
given the minimized atomic write unit is physical sector for all disk.

> +
> +/*
> + * blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_max_sectors - largest unit that can be written
> + * atomically to the device.
> + * @q: the request queue for the device
> + * @sectors: must be a power-of-two.
> + */
> +void blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_max_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
> +					     unsigned int sectors)
> +{
> +	struct queue_limits *limits = &q->limits;
> +
> +	limits->atomic_write_unit_max_sectors = sectors;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_atomic_write_unit_max_sectors);

atomic_write_unit_max_sectors should be >= atomic_write_unit_min_sectors.


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-13  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-12 11:08 [PATCH v2 00/16] block atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] block: Add atomic write operations to request_queue limits John Garry
2023-12-13  1:25   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-12-13  9:13     ` John Garry
2023-12-13 12:28       ` Ming Lei
2023-12-13 19:01         ` John Garry
2023-12-14  4:38         ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-12-14 13:46           ` Ming Lei
2023-12-14  4:34     ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-12-14 16:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] block: Limit atomic writes according to bio and queue limits John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] fs/bdev: Add atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2023-12-13 10:24   ` Jan Kara
2023-12-13 11:02     ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] fs: Increase fmode_t size John Garry
2023-12-13 11:20   ` Jan Kara
2023-12-13 13:03     ` John Garry
2023-12-13 13:02   ` Christian Brauner
2023-12-13 13:15     ` John Garry
2023-12-13 16:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14  8:56       ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] fs: Add RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC flags for atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-13 13:31   ` Al Viro
2023-12-13 16:02     ` John Garry
2024-01-22  8:29   ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] block: Add REQ_ATOMIC flag John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors John Garry
2023-12-15  2:27   ` Ming Lei
2023-12-15 13:55     ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write bio John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] block: Add checks to merging of atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] scsi: sd: Support reading atomic write properties from block limits VPD John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] scsi: sd: Add WRITE_ATOMIC_16 support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] nvme: Support atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] nvme: Ensure atomic writes will be executed atomically John Garry
2023-12-12 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] block atomic writes Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13  9:32   ` John Garry
2023-12-13 15:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:27       ` John Garry
2023-12-14 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 15:46           ` John Garry
2023-12-18 22:50           ` Keith Busch
2023-12-19  5:14         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19  5:21           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 12:41             ` John Garry
2023-12-19 15:17               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 16:53                 ` John Garry
2023-12-21  6:50                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21  9:49                     ` John Garry
2023-12-21 12:19                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 12:48                         ` John Garry
2023-12-21 12:57                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 13:18                             ` John Garry
2023-12-21 13:22                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 13:56                                 ` John Garry
2024-01-16 11:35                                 ` John Garry
2024-01-17 15:02                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-17 16:16                                     ` John Garry
2024-01-09  9:55                     ` John Garry
2024-01-09 16:02                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-09 16:52                         ` John Garry
2024-01-09 23:04                       ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-10  8:55                         ` John Garry
2024-01-10  9:19                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11  1:40                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-11  5:02                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11  9:55                               ` John Garry
2024-01-11 14:45                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:11                                   ` John Garry
2024-01-11 16:15                                     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXkIEnQld577uHqu@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=himanshu.madhani@oracle.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jbongio@google.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).