From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
dchinner@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
jaswin@linux.ibm.com, bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:27:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXu5rykouOcNOSa1@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231212110844.19698-9-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:08:36AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Currently an IO size is limited to the request_queue limits max_sectors.
> Limit the size for an atomic write to queue limit atomic_write_max_sectors
> value.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> block/blk.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 0ccc251e22ff..8d4de9253fe9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,17 @@ static inline unsigned get_max_io_size(struct bio *bio,
> {
> unsigned pbs = lim->physical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> unsigned lbs = lim->logical_block_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> - unsigned max_sectors = lim->max_sectors, start, end;
> + unsigned max_sectors, start, end;
> +
> + /*
> + * We ignore lim->max_sectors for atomic writes simply because
> + * it may less than bio->write_atomic_unit, which we cannot
> + * tolerate.
> + */
> + if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC)
> + max_sectors = lim->atomic_write_max_sectors;
> + else
> + max_sectors = lim->max_sectors;
I can understand the trouble for write atomic from bio split, which
may simply split in the max_sectors boundary, however this change is
still too fragile:
1) ->max_sectors may be set from userspace
- so this change simply override userspace setting
2) otherwise ->max_sectors is same with ->max_hw_sectors:
- then something must be wrong in device side or driver side because
->write_atomic_unit conflicts with ->max_hw_sectors, which is supposed
to be figured out before device is setup
3) too big max_sectors may break driver or device, such as nvme-pci
aligns max_hw_sectors with DMA optimized mapping size
And there might be more(better) choices:
1) make sure atomic write limit is respected when userspace updates
->max_sectors
2) when driver finds that atomic write limits conflict with other
existed hardware limits, fail or solve(such as reduce write atomic unit) the
conflict before queue is started; With single write atomic limits update API,
the conflict can be figured out earlier by block layer too.
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 11:08 [PATCH v2 00/16] block atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] block: Add atomic write operations to request_queue limits John Garry
2023-12-13 1:25 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-13 9:13 ` John Garry
2023-12-13 12:28 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-13 19:01 ` John Garry
2023-12-14 4:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-12-14 13:46 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-14 4:34 ` Martin K. Petersen
2023-12-14 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] block: Limit atomic writes according to bio and queue limits John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] fs/bdev: Add atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2023-12-13 10:24 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-13 11:02 ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] fs: Increase fmode_t size John Garry
2023-12-13 11:20 ` Jan Kara
2023-12-13 13:03 ` John Garry
2023-12-13 13:02 ` Christian Brauner
2023-12-13 13:15 ` John Garry
2023-12-13 16:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 8:56 ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] fs: Add RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC flags for atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-13 13:31 ` Al Viro
2023-12-13 16:02 ` John Garry
2024-01-22 8:29 ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] block: Add REQ_ATOMIC flag John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors John Garry
2023-12-15 2:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-12-15 13:55 ` John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write bio John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] block: Add checks to merging of atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] scsi: sd: Support reading atomic write properties from block limits VPD John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] scsi: sd: Add WRITE_ATOMIC_16 support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] nvme: Support atomic writes John Garry
2023-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] nvme: Ensure atomic writes will be executed atomically John Garry
2023-12-12 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] block atomic writes Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 9:32 ` John Garry
2023-12-13 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:27 ` John Garry
2023-12-14 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 15:46 ` John Garry
2023-12-18 22:50 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-19 5:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-19 5:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 12:41 ` John Garry
2023-12-19 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 16:53 ` John Garry
2023-12-21 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 9:49 ` John Garry
2023-12-21 12:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 12:48 ` John Garry
2023-12-21 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 13:18 ` John Garry
2023-12-21 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 13:56 ` John Garry
2024-01-16 11:35 ` John Garry
2024-01-17 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-17 16:16 ` John Garry
2024-01-09 9:55 ` John Garry
2024-01-09 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-09 16:52 ` John Garry
2024-01-09 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-10 8:55 ` John Garry
2024-01-10 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 1:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-11 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 9:55 ` John Garry
2024-01-11 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-11 16:11 ` John Garry
2024-01-11 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXu5rykouOcNOSa1@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jbongio@google.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).