From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580B7208B8; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706302877; cv=none; b=FkxwQ4fbf7aZMSRiZ2KTRGMBRf0Se006oVqldS8H9qr7Jcm4nsuFbXsueK5YaYcfqQZXTZbAllGv6i5kvveQY6GzOhRuW46O7y7SsL6+I1lTjsuKghS4ugEfemObKSY/yuWkteeAN6quaKVwDo7xGX+TG6MGBI/FBsfB/XwfjGU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706302877; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K/vV4HXLF0w/iq9+oevY/s4BTuCZ0+kwXRPOV5D4Cdo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ia+W0qFrF28D+Tdmx30EMRnSwjlbN8YattjfI70lRC0RiIYZUUYC5R19HUv3blX4kq+eC8j9wWnilb6p3pkbMdasd4agWSKqlco82SR8kT5zSiMc6HsVZF3iwXNXEE2Fp0ormtUKPn43SiQBzHKIXR3TzeG7FJ7jM2VPoZSMjdo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=a6nigD30; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="a6nigD30" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=r/QEG1+GRs70rQ+r6RwZXc9jTJs5Jf1cK8sS2vy9OTU=; b=a6nigD30c17ynoFn1++uO4A7rB gBLNhhEo+pCSqVhVYWH0mQV6ltDRyprpRDjL6ZBPRRZEpeyZpNb/IZbOXUdO9Cj6m2GKVXw+2Dj0T MdRat3pIfEqyJ8iv7xrggI+qBxtQuetCP89u3dcSf3mcZI2Kw9J6bJly4sclyfPZfo214N3SwhMvT yy4ufWAt98IFJ2EHzZmNeRiRWxDwzn9T2LrRSWM45f1wBizs0lEuWmYfrZG3ofJkG3CMweKlUwv21 Dvz3wChQlBJd/S7n1XHNcZCuYY9DfjNi063dK0fGrElQSJ45A/Gzy2azctDB6oPreBUMcbXB7tgac wpF82cMg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rTTJz-0000000EqNO-07FO; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:01:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:01:06 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Pankaj Raghav , Jaegeuk Kim , Yangtao Li , chao@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fengnanchang@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, vishal.moola@gmail.com, Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= , Adam Manzanares Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Support enhanced hot/cold data separation for f2fs Message-ID: References: <20221130124804.79845-1-frank.li@vivo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:54:47PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:47:39PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:13PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > Me and Pankaj are very interested in helping on this front. And so we'll > > > start to organize and talk every week about this to see what is missing. > > > First order of business however will be testing so we'll have to > > > establish a public baseline to ensure we don't regress. For this we intend > > > on using kdevops so that'll be done first. > > > > > > If folks have patches they want to test in consideration for folio / > > > iomap enhancements feel free to Cc us :) > > > > > > After we establish a baseline we can move forward with taking on tasks > > > which will help with this conversion. > > > > So ... it's been a year. How is this project coming along? There > > weren't a lot of commits to f2fs in 2023 that were folio related. > > The review at LSFMM revealed iomap based filesystems were the priority > and so that has been the priority. Once we tackle that and get XFS > support we can revisit which next fs to help out with. Testing has been > a *huge* part of our endeavor, and naturally getting XFS patches up to > what is required has just taken a bit more time. But you can expect > patches for that within a month or so. Is anyone working on the iomap conversion for f2fs?