From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: mm/madvise: set ra_pages as device max request size during ADV_POPULATE_READ
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 23:43:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zbxy30POPE8rN_YN@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202022029.1903629-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 01 2024 at 9:20P -0500,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> madvise(MADV_POPULATE_READ) tries to populate all page tables in the
> specific range, so it is usually sequential IO if VMA is backed by
> file.
>
> Set ra_pages as device max request size for the involved readahead in
> the ADV_POPULATE_READ, this way reduces latency of madvise(MADV_POPULATE_READ)
> to 1/10 when running madvise(MADV_POPULATE_READ) over one 1GB file with
> usual(default) 128KB of read_ahead_kb.
>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rafael Aquini <raquini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/madvise.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 912155a94ed5..db5452c8abdd 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -900,6 +900,37 @@ static long madvise_dontneed_free(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static void madvise_restore_ra_win(struct file **file, unsigned int ra_pages)
> +{
> + if (*file) {
> + struct file *f = *file;
> +
> + f->f_ra.ra_pages = ra_pages;
> + fput(f);
> + *file = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct file *madvise_override_ra_win(struct file *f,
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + unsigned int *old_ra_pages)
> +{
> + unsigned int io_pages;
> +
> + if (!f || !f->f_mapping || !f->f_mapping->host)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + io_pages = inode_to_bdi(f->f_mapping->host)->io_pages;
> + if (((end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) < io_pages)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + f = get_file(f);
> + *old_ra_pages = f->f_ra.ra_pages;
> + f->f_ra.ra_pages = io_pages;
> +
> + return f;
> +}
> +
Does this override imply that madvise_populate resorts to calling
filemap_fault() and here you're just arming it to use the larger
->io_pages for the duration of all associated faulting?
Wouldn't it be better to avoid faulting and build up larger page
vectors that get sent down to the block layer in one go and let the
block layer split using the device's limits? (like happens with
force_page_cache_ra)
I'm concerned that madvise_populate isn't so efficient with filemap
due to excessive faulting (*BUT* I haven't traced to know, I'm just
inferring that is why twiddling f->f_ra.ra_pages helps improve
madvise_populate by having it issue larger IO. Apologies if I'm way
off base)
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 2:20 [PATCH] mm/madvise: set ra_pages as device max request size during ADV_POPULATE_READ Ming Lei
2024-02-02 4:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-02 4:48 ` Ming Lei
2024-02-02 4:43 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2024-02-02 10:52 ` Ming Lei
2024-02-02 14:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-02-04 23:34 ` [PATCH] " Dave Chinner
2024-02-05 9:53 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zbxy30POPE8rN_YN@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=raquini@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).