From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f201.google.com (mail-yw1-f201.google.com [209.85.128.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD2B13DBAE for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707941875; cv=none; b=rE3kjyfkD/vq8UnDU9omD6V83ccuMJLjfQev/R/AynWc6hhtdpAMYEbxeXPVX9kJCuS5LaRYKGvhKgLp3GWTZA5o4ykt47UCIZvJ75xSJSin9SAUea2pJpHaZ8DJiB+CgIsFOKEyZFLl1XePoa9e+qAk8VdClXF/LDdeiTIqsWA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707941875; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LRwkqgTwbjojrvWlVJdTvGNtTmKNlI/lqhoWnlH86aU=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=pwABqscJGL3ui//2Rso6Nq2yZtNjD2qJeZBD2eXV3MUthwHplO58hnC3OANkmbCoV4Mxpr6jBdQg7QtIcUiy/Ad4G+rHKsRuTjDDjGiFX6DrcsR9SItxkdu5lNxF2NrK+P2YTf0QF+XSBoOAL5AinbnIP4PY8dmuJLsp5opdvGs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yosryahmed.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=DiGIfItW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yosryahmed.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="DiGIfItW" Received: by mail-yw1-f201.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5ee22efe5eeso2757797b3.3 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:17:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1707941872; x=1708546672; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DFRgEJKqx8IUK/onZJk4TNjtYloWEJQ2VMeYiwjP0ZI=; b=DiGIfItWbnQ5p1uLFwILlUgy2jXW0bqov0ksG0kcuH9lHg08UBB/puF+KuQMHafJhm snr6xO1Yjtvp1sIq4DH//10Dno5VuoTf3Q0R27qiOOXKpTOiNeT9Vn0D50M+W3fXukd5 8KmunndnPzJiSlBPI7gHgPcsei3UiqYprEncQVgDZACtvVIwlDzdB+BGRuj2NixpVRAI 4Wp0GAEdEdr/mlPmvpGL1gbGNp88p1OCmg/RTi4JTab6deKCPXgWGhAIeUp4sNz4FWDg TEjAqTqprDEUX00BxmyX2zhkr2m7bfQbl86rEb9vXQmlQ2BrNBZ/w3l+U8chNdGe+3oS Fq0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707941872; x=1708546672; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DFRgEJKqx8IUK/onZJk4TNjtYloWEJQ2VMeYiwjP0ZI=; b=qES85HKcC31BJRV6das4rqDEzxuy79wSTgK7/iRucGaO0mK5fuW+0Qb0xTL8TNMcoX RFCnG0WpVRkkNuDa6FeA0YtizakIfdZAV7B/+bMQTN0lt9Iyj6uLdYUHcs9UUzB5afH1 WCH8cGMnzKcmQyqIoxjGCpbn/TeCY9b9uJtvCvNW/hd0OOQJb6b1YrGavL32rVs25UZm PfQr463FHQbwd+2uP75Ci0H4BcLp1k3KZzUyTsKvJ3vLw92yOaAeeNGOyqwAFNZ0SJ+C LjE1P18TUA29iDA6Wkih9xfPgSbqAY53mC19K7tG+Mv1fqOhbyjoNaPYp19uUseAUOqA jtaA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUnrEg5lP7qQUzlPTp8cq/Az+JN/GkMSM+SRtjuntoEN+LYl/vwcwxoyOh2eFrVNIozmUE7M79itPlCs+oX3GYo2Z/SJrvs3FWthdJUWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwdDlUd3ZeSvE4wbaaQzwsrCKUM7JhSN+Xdr8Hu1tJAJjnaO93m lapFEddmbY3CepODuIz5f0WmPteq67UAf1qyqRIyqFDGtV7/dUf3yp1kJz1EwrFEGkbDDkgGMLT rK2IxfH+nYZJh2MWvBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEEh8/ECloTKF61F6HKam49RgeIZc46jcrBkT8h5W2oQ9+AR1Ak+1Ihvk+tliAKuf+Xfoj/5sdOnEOLcBzz X-Received: from yosry.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:20:ed76:c0a8:29b4]) (user=yosryahmed job=sendgmr) by 2002:a0d:eac3:0:b0:5ff:b07b:fb83 with SMTP id t186-20020a0deac3000000b005ffb07bfb83mr555354ywe.4.1707941872610; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:17:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:17:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240212213922.783301-1-surenb@google.com> <4f24986587b53be3f9ece187a3105774eb27c12f.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Memory allocation profiling From: Yosry Ahmed To: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Tim Chen , akpm@linux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, mgorman@suse.de, dave@stgolabs.net, willy@infradead.org, liam.howlett@oracle.com, corbet@lwn.net, void@manifault.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, mcgrof@kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, yuzhao@google.com, dhowells@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, vvvvvv@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ebiggers@google.com, ytcoode@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, glider@google.com, elver@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com, jbaron@akamai.com, rientjes@google.com, minchan@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, kernel-team@android.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > Performance overhead: > > > To evaluate performance we implemented an in-kernel test executing > > > multiple get_free_page/free_page and kmalloc/kfree calls with allocation > > > sizes growing from 8 to 240 bytes with CPU frequency set to max and CPU > > > affinity set to a specific CPU to minimize the noise. Below are results > > > from running the test on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS with 6.8.0-rc1 kernel on > > > 56 core Intel Xeon: > > > > > > kmalloc pgalloc > > > (1 baseline) 6.764s 16.902s > > > (2 default disabled) 6.793s (+0.43%) 17.007s (+0.62%) > > > (3 default enabled) 7.197s (+6.40%) 23.666s (+40.02%) > > > (4 runtime enabled) 7.405s (+9.48%) 23.901s (+41.41%) > > > (5 memcg) 13.388s (+97.94%) 48.460s (+186.71%) > > (6 default disabled+memcg) 13.332s (+97.10%) 48.105s (+184.61%) > (7 default enabled+memcg) 13.446s (+98.78%) 54.963s (+225.18%) I think these numbers are very interesting for folks that already use memcg. Specifically, the difference between 6 & 7, which seems to be ~0.85% and ~14.25%. IIUC, this means that the extra overhead is relatively much lower if someone is already using memcgs. > > (6) shows a bit better performance than (5) but it's probably noise. I > would expect them to be roughly the same. Hope this helps. > > > > > > > >