From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9548562A for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707497756; cv=none; b=heunCNidMNrLZeYmH3cn0t3P+QC8w11mfRTHFYnMkDIzOAHKmoxAtDpXeLQQBStquimjDQ/ZuEG/r0jZmYOOTWoLK7lKiLBMPct5LgkKzhZYFQ47NlsSyyD9Dt6/f1+JfE+chSa4B92sXar8/K3CpRSq/nkyUmi1pw6HQDM6xz8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707497756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7714CKHW48PHFblzrTkdEL2BUKx67e7+0EV/IV50A/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pZRLxl3KoW9oJtBtfVT2f0O1TOHd6twzWB1PuSRW5JVd6JPlEvkGYdlf+TyOmYvd2ojHE3/UgKGk5GwwFNOoJDw3+kwWzhIk82lEzCwUR/bOfIydWRZDBlV8kYIc3zqQ9x67+EJe8PQuqfBZ5Pe8VO/5OIgYoulmXcDqxgtzBww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=elFz1iYs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="elFz1iYs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707497753; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sL+ofHaA6qkvKS8NQqYBzY53+wD0U1HeESIJKFSgtF4=; b=elFz1iYsRpjL7ayKig1KEBl+e2Yfibu/0BkrCcr2Kx9OvVcySZ9xfy3m7HxeJ+X4lkaG6q FpjqrX6NaEINw01sjl9gADBDX3gWpKCeFoSo4KFl+2gidRP2OWSws8NmsClpk3Eb2f1D1S JYIR+KpePFtimV1rEbYJgkpBwVapt28= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-28-xl4UwJNzOKqwE4WOCyb2iw-1; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:55:52 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xl4UwJNzOKqwE4WOCyb2iw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC03862DC2; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.32.174]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0524D2026D06; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:55:50 -0600 From: Bill O'Donnell To: Damien Le Moal Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] zonefs: convert zonefs to use the new mount api Message-ID: References: <20240209000857.21040-1-bodonnel@redhat.com> <54dca606-e67f-4933-b8ca-a5e2095193ae@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54dca606-e67f-4933-b8ca-a5e2095193ae@kernel.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:10:00AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2/9/24 09:08, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > > Convert the zonefs filesystem to use the new mount API. > > Tested using the zonefs test suite from: > > https://github.com/damien-lemoal/zonefs-tools > > > > Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell > > Thanks for doing this. I will run tests on this but I do have a few nits below. I will provide a v2 with the changes you suggest, with one exception (please see my note within). > > > --- > > fs/zonefs/super.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/zonefs/super.c b/fs/zonefs/super.c > > index e6a75401677d..6b8ecd2e55b8 100644 > > --- a/fs/zonefs/super.c > > +++ b/fs/zonefs/super.c > > @@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > -#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > - > > +#include > > +#include > > Please keep the whiteline here. > > > #include "zonefs.h" > > > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS > > @@ -460,58 +460,47 @@ static int zonefs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf) > > } > > > > enum { > > - Opt_errors_ro, Opt_errors_zro, Opt_errors_zol, Opt_errors_repair, > > - Opt_explicit_open, Opt_err, > > + Opt_errors, Opt_explicit_open, > > }; > > > > -static const match_table_t tokens = { > > - { Opt_errors_ro, "errors=remount-ro"}, > > - { Opt_errors_zro, "errors=zone-ro"}, > > - { Opt_errors_zol, "errors=zone-offline"}, > > - { Opt_errors_repair, "errors=repair"}, > > - { Opt_explicit_open, "explicit-open" }, > > - { Opt_err, NULL} > > +struct zonefs_context { > > + unsigned long s_mount_opts; > > }; > > > > -static int zonefs_parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options) > > -{ > > - struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi = ZONEFS_SB(sb); > > - substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS]; > > - char *p; > > - > > - if (!options) > > - return 0; > > - > > - while ((p = strsep(&options, ",")) != NULL) { > > - int token; > > +static const struct constant_table zonefs_param_errors[] = { > > + {"remount-ro", ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_RO}, > > + {"zone-ro", ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_ZRO}, > > + {"zone-offline", ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_ZOL}, > > + {"repair", ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_REPAIR}, > > + {} > > +}; > > > > - if (!*p) > > - continue; > > +static const struct fs_parameter_spec zonefs_param_spec[] = { > > + fsparam_enum ("errors", Opt_errors, zonefs_param_errors), > > + fsparam_flag ("explicit-open", Opt_explicit_open), > > + {} > > +}; > > > > - token = match_token(p, tokens, args); > > - switch (token) { > > - case Opt_errors_ro: > > - sbi->s_mount_opts &= ~ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_MASK; > > - sbi->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_RO; > > - break; > > - case Opt_errors_zro: > > - sbi->s_mount_opts &= ~ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_MASK; > > - sbi->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_ZRO; > > - break; > > - case Opt_errors_zol: > > - sbi->s_mount_opts &= ~ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_MASK; > > - sbi->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_ZOL; > > - break; > > - case Opt_errors_repair: > > - sbi->s_mount_opts &= ~ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_MASK; > > - sbi->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_REPAIR; > > - break; > > - case Opt_explicit_open: > > - sbi->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_EXPLICIT_OPEN; > > - break; > > - default: > > - return -EINVAL; > > - } > > +static int zonefs_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) > > +{ > > + struct zonefs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > > + struct fs_parse_result result; > > + int opt; > > + > > + opt = fs_parse(fc, zonefs_param_spec, param, &result); > > + if (opt < 0) > > + return opt; > > + > > + switch (opt) { > > + case Opt_errors: > > + ctx->s_mount_opts &= ~ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_MASK; > > + ctx->s_mount_opts |= result.uint_32; > > + break; > > + case Opt_explicit_open: > > + ctx->s_mount_opts |= ZONEFS_MNTOPT_EXPLICIT_OPEN; > > + break; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > return 0; > > @@ -533,11 +522,19 @@ static int zonefs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static int zonefs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > > +static int zonefs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc); > > Why the forward definition ? It seems that you could define this function here > directly. > > > + > > +static int zonefs_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc) > > { > > - sync_filesystem(sb); > > + struct zonefs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > > + struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb; > > + struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info; > > > > - return zonefs_parse_options(sb, data); > > + sync_filesystem(fc->root->d_sb); > > + /* Copy new options from ctx into sbi. */ > > + sbi->s_mount_opts = ctx->s_mount_opts; > > + > > + return 0; > > } > > > > static int zonefs_inode_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, > > @@ -1197,7 +1194,6 @@ static const struct super_operations zonefs_sops = { > > .alloc_inode = zonefs_alloc_inode, > > .free_inode = zonefs_free_inode, > > .statfs = zonefs_statfs, > > - .remount_fs = zonefs_remount, > > .show_options = zonefs_show_options, > > }; > > > > @@ -1242,9 +1238,10 @@ static void zonefs_release_zgroup_inodes(struct super_block *sb) > > * sub-directories and files according to the device zone configuration and > > * format options. > > */ > > -static int zonefs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > > +static int zonefs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc) > > { > > struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi; > > + struct zonefs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > > struct inode *inode; > > enum zonefs_ztype ztype; > > int ret; > > @@ -1281,21 +1278,17 @@ static int zonefs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > > sbi->s_uid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID; > > sbi->s_gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID; > > sbi->s_perm = 0640; > > - sbi->s_mount_opts = ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_RO; > > - > > + sbi->s_mount_opts = ctx->s_mount_opts; > > Please keep the white line here... > > > atomic_set(&sbi->s_wro_seq_files, 0); > > sbi->s_max_wro_seq_files = bdev_max_open_zones(sb->s_bdev); > > atomic_set(&sbi->s_active_seq_files, 0); > > + > > ...and remove this one. The initializations here are "grouped" together byt > "theme" (sbi standard stuff first and zone resource accounting in a second > "paragraph". I like to keep it that way. > > > sbi->s_max_active_seq_files = bdev_max_active_zones(sb->s_bdev); > > > > ret = zonefs_read_super(sb); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > - ret = zonefs_parse_options(sb, data); > > - if (ret) > > - return ret; > > - > > zonefs_info(sb, "Mounting %u zones", bdev_nr_zones(sb->s_bdev)); > > > > if (!sbi->s_max_wro_seq_files && > > @@ -1356,12 +1349,6 @@ static int zonefs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static struct dentry *zonefs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, > > - int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data) > > -{ > > - return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data, zonefs_fill_super); > > -} > > - > > static void zonefs_kill_super(struct super_block *sb) > > { > > struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi = ZONEFS_SB(sb); > > @@ -1376,17 +1363,54 @@ static void zonefs_kill_super(struct super_block *sb) > > kfree(sbi); > > } > > > > +static void zonefs_free_fc(struct fs_context *fc) > > +{ > > + struct zonefs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private; > > I do not think you need this variable. > > > + > > + kfree(ctx); > > Is it safe to not set fc->fs_private to NULL ? I agree that ctx is not needed, and instead kfree(fc->fs_private) is sufficient. However, since other fs conversions do not simply set fc->fs_private to NULL, kfree(fc_fs_private) is preferred here. > > > +} > > + > > +static const struct fs_context_operations zonefs_context_ops = { > > + .parse_param = zonefs_parse_param, > > + .get_tree = zonefs_get_tree, > > + .reconfigure = zonefs_reconfigure, > > + .free = zonefs_free_fc, > > +}; > > + > > +/* > > + * Set up the filesystem mount context. > > + */ > > +static int zonefs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) > > +{ > > + struct zonefs_context *ctx; > > + > > + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct zonefs_context), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!ctx) > > + return 0; > > return 0 ? Shouldn't this be "return -ENOMEM" ? > > > + ctx->s_mount_opts = ZONEFS_MNTOPT_ERRORS_RO; > > + fc->ops = &zonefs_context_ops; > > + fc->fs_private = ctx; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > /* > > * File system definition and registration. > > */ > > static struct file_system_type zonefs_type = { > > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > .name = "zonefs", > > - .mount = zonefs_mount, > > .kill_sb = zonefs_kill_super, > > .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV, > > + .init_fs_context = zonefs_init_fs_context, > > + .parameters = zonefs_param_spec, > > Please re-align everything together. > > > }; > > > > +static int zonefs_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc) > > +{ > > + return get_tree_bdev(fc, zonefs_fill_super); > > +} > > + > > static int __init zonefs_init_inodecache(void) > > { > > zonefs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("zonefs_inode_cache", > > -- > Damien Le Moal > Western Digital Research >