From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838CA7472 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708390293; cv=none; b=EPSUMVQQHnkJCC8+W1e8YTNlqM+bQEn1vuIzGq9qoLOMavqprCQj9sUrpeG0e9Zs/aMpLImKzexbv2RRJxlX5zNcIvfibSpx5JeK8cmFo2MazbHmHvWMk9n5Q0twJubONsqxNPzj/Da2QU5Fs2gGVMnB/A4lh6dZ0/RsLHXVCKM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708390293; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QJ/UucmQfy6TFKmkSSfPI8zK2k9mW41Ve0eZm5xuh14=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IVb+fwipVcRk6WugfwCbTTknfgvJtuSN+jxJJyNBFZO/hWVArrQyZgXpjJqgpHxyqje2zeKLfYVlCnWcg6O3a5i2hZ2lBwJ4NjP23JadcDGA7AxcIa8BD/qdfN+lgt6m5sXrHmWjosBH08kUPWrGErw26URAuBh0h1Z+H0HQ5Zc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=DG2JOtRz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DG2JOtRz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708390290; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2766/Q+VAKCk7P5UAFOLvdi2ajKP6ngFDN5XcWc/bPM=; b=DG2JOtRz0cr51AK2xIg9LqHG/I701R7e2taqKzHgUy6qli6vwhOJ7Yz54zDqhue2gDUUOi fpCjXHlO2/YMLHQmGQMpHhetN3XpvGRewf7DaksFzny4fd1pv57ZWClWiHzfGmcYzMjzV2 Fx4lK/tv83uIPE8B5zWroN+muml/EYI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-445-t0KWA3UgPMSPW0mLLVHBog-1; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:51:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: t0KWA3UgPMSPW0mLLVHBog-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51470101A52A; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.33.227]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A321C060AF; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:51:24 -0600 From: Bill O'Donnell To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] efs: convert efs to use the new mount api Message-ID: References: <20240220003318.166143-1-bodonnel@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:46:35AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 06:33:18PM -0600, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > > Convert the efs filesystem to use the new mount API. > > Hey Bill, what testing were you able to do for this? I found some EFS > images, but they didn't have any symlinks in them, so I wasn't able to > test my rewrite of the symlink handling code. Do you have a source of > EFS images? > Hi Matthew- I only checked if it mounts and remounts. Since no mount options, my testing was minimal. Thanks- Bill