From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A01A12A14A; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708962833; cv=none; b=Q+qjIYpGQ5Kt2JoscQseZWwogyY+RPtjxxuIXhgzX1ZRGrqX6ZmQ/p5hEdFbfGv86Vh0E3Zpn543egR5fzzIyRjY8+2ooeut1/ArS6a+ka4E+W6CXC0n1lXIFQRvUahzN+qnTaBq37Ma3Zji5M63pd5CK1uXsNXXndMqs5o7vrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708962833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OhS4vDw10qcJb+eT/2xNrJGDLexPIJn56JWLFV7mSLU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D0mBcZ8WOcpABAJmRw7BIeYW0I3l34rxRbstsNIWQzWRsPOJgRNsnSuH+eqKXwzaouEz7NA4YEK+stXpACwnj7EZTqEToNPOhuw9i4/yniTuk+EIpJ7tNkQsAHRf3p/BjPUHyV+8/vZWTVdYw/+GUGZGyIX/MKSI0Ed/uOGHfd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=LQQ3nBpP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="LQQ3nBpP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=4th8cNSX4xav3thjL9AsP3JA1usOiTW53dcNZF3hTUE=; b=LQQ3nBpPyY7lmm0uyX6l5q7O7y 9LIXCw8oRW15B6dslBF1PJxG1kiFvAd9Gm8xBShVpBpeZn5dOdLQlYb3/Q9fndSZv25r+jsjnIyyA W7EMn8fysavG5a8WcWh5C4JIl4SaZqCiuI426x9gqJZYDWOUWXpd2jtqq9vHEkXis9GF+DtB7rsSm Sm9wfspkbv/EmBcQXKm5/MrOTxu2+IATM9OtN6CGrIRCHIFt+ordidJDqo7XFCap3nN0DWTKkym1o 6SQTWQS1LiJVaxZBLU97fHt7scS8jlua7IHk10+S+wakCz4KGqL3iAg/1TXh7gOW22gc/pfVnJaHs vcpzEf9w==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1redIW-00000001WNL-0Rf1; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:53:44 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:53:44 -0800 From: Luis Chamberlain To: John Groves Cc: John Groves , Jonathan Corbet , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, john@jagalactic.com, Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, gregory.price@memverge.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/20] Introduce the famfs shared-memory file system Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Luis Chamberlain On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 07:27:18AM -0600, John Groves wrote: > Run status group 0 (all jobs): > WRITE: bw=29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s), 29.6GiB/s-29.6GiB/s (31.8GB/s-31.8GB/s), io=44.7GiB (48.0GB), run=1511-1511msec > This is run on an xfs file system on a SATA ssd. To compare more closer apples to apples, wouldn't it make more sense to try this with XFS on pmem (with fio -direct=1)? Luis